@0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 3 months agoIndeedlemmy.dbzer0.comimagemessage-square206fedilinkarrow-up1915arrow-down139
arrow-up1876arrow-down1imageIndeedlemmy.dbzer0.com@0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.com to linuxmemes@lemmy.world • 3 months agomessage-square206fedilink
minus-square@mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglish1•3 months agoWell if glibc is supported all glibc softwares must work right?? Patching the software to support musl would not be needed if it does support glibc
minus-square@TheEntity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink3•3 months agoEven if it’s supported, it doesn’t mean it needs to be installed in every system. If the user wants to use a Musl-based system, the software working only on glibc needs to be patched. At least that’s how I understood these statements.
minus-square@0x4E4F@lemmy.dbzer0.comOPlinkfedilink1•3 months agoSome patches are there for software that reauires systemd or parts of it.
minus-squareAndromxda 🇺🇦🇵🇸🇹🇼linkfedilink1•3 months agoBut the Void Linux team specifically wants to support both glibc and musl
Well if glibc is supported all glibc softwares must work right?? Patching the software to support musl would not be needed if it does support glibc
Even if it’s supported, it doesn’t mean it needs to be installed in every system. If the user wants to use a Musl-based system, the software working only on glibc needs to be patched. At least that’s how I understood these statements.
Some patches are there for software that reauires systemd or parts of it.
But the Void Linux team specifically wants to support both glibc and musl