• ProgrammingSocks
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 months ago

    Spoken like someone who doesn’t understand why people engage with art in the first place. AKA a techbro.

    • istanbullu@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      People love Stable Diffusion, and use it a lot. Why do you think is that?

      • ProgrammingSocks
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 months ago

        Because most people don’t engage with art critically. See Marvel movies. Maybe others are fine with remixed slop but I am not.

    • UnderwaterSwift@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 months ago

      It has already happened in our lifetime with medical illustration. This is pre-gpt. It will just now spread. Are generated diagrams worse in subtle ways? Yes, but not enough to matter for the difference in first or ease of use.

      • tacomama@leminal.space
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 months ago

        Nah. Association of Medical Illustrators

        I have a Masters in Medical Art. (late 1980s) 35 years ago some were saying ‘we won’t need medical artists because of photography’ and then a few years later ‘because of personal computers’. This isn’t the case. But when the general public has access to a tool they love to talk about how a discipline is going away because ‘now anyone can do it’.