This headline, while factually accurate, is tonally misleading.

He only used ChatGPT to get a definition of what a deepfake is, because he was having trouble defining it himself. He took a screenshot of the response, everyone knew it was from ChatGPT. The definition was thoroughly reviewed by humans and mostly accepted.

The assumption I, and I assume most readers, made from the title is that he tried to use ChatGPT to do his job for him and the results were comical or disastrous in some way and that the article is going to be a name-and-shame piece, which it is not.