• @Aceticon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    151 month ago

    I’m sorry but Free Speech is exactly about anybody, a.k.a. random, persons having a freedom, and there is no mention about “allies” or any other special groups having any more right to it than anybody else exactly because you can’t have one Freedom for some and a different Freedom for others: Free it’s for everybody, otherwise it’s not Free, it’s Controlled.

    You claim this is a Free Speech matter and then your entire argument is about speech for some people controlled by an invitation of a specifica person, the very opposite of Free.

    As I said, if Congress should be treated as a Free Speech space then ANYBODY has a right to go there and speak (and Netanyahu can join the queue), if only some people are allowed to go there, controlled by an invitation by a specific person, then it’s not Free Speech, it’s about a space with access limited by rules, be it to speak or something else, so it’s about Congressional Rules and your entire “argument” is total bollocks.

    You can’t try and bypass the rules by claiming it’s all about Free Speech at the very same time you want it for just this one person just this one time - that’s just complete total hypocrisy.

    • @S_204@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      -201 month ago

      Sure, you’ve convinced me, anyone that the speaker of the house thinks deserves that platform should have it then, ally or not.

      That you think limiting the ability of people to speak before Congress, isn’t stifling free speech is beyond absurd.

        • @S_204@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          -51 month ago

          I’m hardly concerned with who’s the one giving the speech and entirely concerned with the fact the Democratic party is working overtime to stifle Free speech before the American Congress.