• @AVincentInSpace
    link
    English
    13
    edit-2
    28 days ago

    No, but each individual human is assigned identically one gayness value, therefore the number of values we must sort is equal to the number of living humans

    • @TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      328 days ago

      But the possible number of outcomes is not limited by the subset of living humans. While we may have a currently highest number that doesn’t mean it IS the highest possible, nor that there is exactly one of them.

      • Tar_Alcaran
        link
        fedilink
        628 days ago

        While we may have a currently highest number that doesn’t mean it IS the highest possible

        I would argue you can only be gay if you’re alive, so you only need to compare living people, the theoretical maximum doesn’t matter, only the actual maximum of a finite number.

        nor that there is exactly one of them.

        Agreed. It might be a shared gold medal.

      • @AVincentInSpace
        link
        English
        4
        edit-2
        28 days ago

        It is true that the gayest person currently alive, the gayest person ever in history, and the gayest person who could possibly exist may well exhibit three different levels of gayness; however, I believe that, were one sufficiently determined, it would be possible to find all three.