• @Glowstick@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    281 month ago

    Same thing happened with his other trials. A fast verdict from the jury means the case was completely air-tight solid to the jurors. He was so clearly guilty that there was nothing to even discuss

    • @Wahots
      link
      101 month ago

      They still discussed it for 10 hours. That’s a pretty decent amount of time. And requested transcripts from previous portions of the trial, too.

      • @Glowstick@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 month ago

        True, but it’s still quite quick. In fact IMO having a few hours of deliberation is probably a good thing for the country, because now they can’t say the verdict came back so quickly that it proves it must’ve been rigged. I’m sure they’ll still say it was rigged anyway, but they won’t be able to point to a 5 minute deliberation as supposed evidence