• Duallight
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -1630 days ago

    Eh, all he did was accept money to do exactly what he does: play a concert. Now if he canceled other concerts just for this, that would be a different story IMO. The Amazon execs would just buy a yacht or something instead if Dave declined.

    • @Isoprenoid@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      8030 days ago

      Ah the ol’ “If I didn’t accept the money to do something unethical, then someone else would have done it.” argument.

      • Duallight
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3530 days ago

        Yeah, I can see how it could be seen that way. I’m thinking more along the lines of “Dave performs for money. Someone wants to pay a lot of money for a special performance, and it doesn’t affect any of his other shows so of course he would do it”. IMO what Dave did isn’t unethical, but I can see how it could be seen that way. But I also think if the article was “Amazon Execs bought a multi million dollar yacht after massive layoffs”, no one would be blaming the yacht manufacturer. Just the execs.

        • @zaph@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          2030 days ago

          no one would be blaming the yacht manufacturer

          I already don’t support yacht manufacturers. I own foo fighters albums. There is a massive difference in your example.

          • @micka190@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1830 days ago

            Here’s a better one: If the Amazon execs threw a private party, no one would be blaming the caterers.

          • Duallight
            link
            fedilink
            English
            1430 days ago

            The yacht was a bad example. What I’m getting at is that not hating something is not the same as supporting it. I don’t support Dave doing this, but I don’t hate him for doing it either.

        • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          830 days ago

          Perhaps it’s not against Dave Grohl’s ethics but it’s certainly against mine so all I can do is add the Foo Fighters to the ever growing list of people or companies that don’t get my attention or money.

          To be honest I’m thankful all this stuff is out in the open as I’m saving a lot of money.

          I don’t shop on Amazon, don’t use social media, don’t eat McD, don’t buy Foo Fighters albums, don’t watch Will Smith movies, etc.

          • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -530 days ago

            Ah, the piecemeal approach to becoming a hermit. Eventually you’ll just add literally everything to your “failed my purity test” list.

            • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              629 days ago

              I don’t know. Macklemore is a pretty stand up guy and will stand by his morals. Plenty of people ain’t selling out and plenty of people stand up for what they believe in.

              Kinda strange all the back lash for my choice here but y’all won’t give the same backlash for FF choice. Double standards much.

              • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -329 days ago

                I’m not talking to Dave Grohl, I’m talking to you.

                Don’t expect perfection, or you’ll always be disappointed by people. Macklemore included lol

                • @dependencyinjection@discuss.tchncs.de
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  429 days ago

                  I don’t expect perfection. I am not perfect m, merely holding people to a higher standard than some.

                  You do you bro and I’ll do me. It’s not that deep.

                  Have a wonderful weekend, I know I will.