• Pixel
    link
    English
    1916 days ago

    I was born in 98, my brother was born in 2000. The level of computer literacy just between the two of us is astounding. While a lot of my aptitude with computers stems from a personal interest, even growing up many of my peers were relatively tech savvy – as far as laypeople go. But people in my brother’s grade in school, people just two years younger than me, i noticed a meaningful difference in how they interact with computers vs how people I spent the formative years of my life around do. It’s insane.

    • @antlion@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1316 days ago

      Hopefully my rough estimate of 1995 was not too exclusive. I’m sure there’s not a hard cutoff, and the same goes for pre-1975. But being right in the middle of that range, it was pretty cool to use the full spectrum of PCs, and all the game consoles, and see the internet bloom and explode and decay.

      • Pixel
        link
        English
        416 days ago

        Oh I bet, and fwiw I think that’s a pretty good estimate of that bell curve – I’m just on the tail end of it, so I got to see an actual decline in tech literacy in the people literally in my immediate orbit. It was an interesting experience, for sure

    • @GiveMemes@jlai.lu
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1116 days ago

      I think for those of us that were born 2000 and later the amount of tech experience we have probably has a strong correlation with who was into PC gaming/modding as kids.

      • @Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        215 days ago

        Most certainly.
        My higher computer literacy stems solely from personal interest.
        The IT education in school was basic office usage and other “normie” tasks. Not even typing classes…Still doing the 4,5 finger blind/hunt writing system.