jeffw@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 year agoSupreme Court sides with Starbucks in labor case that could hinder government’s ability to intervene in some unionization disputestheconversation.comexternal-linkmessage-square8linkfedilinkarrow-up1173arrow-down11
arrow-up1172arrow-down1external-linkSupreme Court sides with Starbucks in labor case that could hinder government’s ability to intervene in some unionization disputestheconversation.comjeffw@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square8linkfedilink
minus-squaredrdiddlybadgerlinkfedilinkarrow-up73·1 year agoI’m sorry but SCOTUS has decided we get to go back to the old ways of labor disputes.
minus-squareIrremarkable@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up20·1 year agoI know which side I’m on, that’s for damn sure
minus-squarekora@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up10·1 year agoWhile we’re at it, lets go ahead and yeet the system as a whole.
minus-squareroofuskit@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·11 months agoYou mean when they called in the army to gun us down?
minus-squarecaptainlezbian@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11 months agoAnd we shoot back. Yes the class war
I’m sorry but SCOTUS has decided we get to go back to the old ways of labor disputes.
To shreds, you say?
I know which side I’m on, that’s for damn sure
While we’re at it, lets go ahead and yeet the system as a whole.
You mean when they called in the army to gun us down?
And we shoot back. Yes the class war