downpunxx to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 17 days agomath checks outfedia.ioimagemessage-square106fedilinkarrow-up11.57Karrow-down112
arrow-up11.56Karrow-down1imagemath checks outfedia.iodownpunxx to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world • 17 days agomessage-square106fedilink
minus-square@egeres@lemmy.worldlinkfedilink14•edit-214 days agoEehrm, acktually, the tweet is wrong 🤓 You can always be getting a result above average in a series of numbers as long as the nth number is significantly greater than the previous ones. For example, f(x) = x^2 would always be above average for every next number
minus-square@Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.eelinkfedilink3•16 days agoI like the idea of an infinitely exponentially growing base of users seeking help from some poor call center
minus-square@b000rg@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglish3•16 days agoThis honestly sounds like it could be the basis for a novella
minus-square@Migmog@lemm.eelinkfedilink2•16 days agoIt sounds like something that happens regularly during an update to software with a lot of users.
minus-square@lseif@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilink3•16 days agoif it is considering the average for all of history, then the rate of change would just have to be consistently greater than 0, right ?
Eehrm, acktually, the tweet is wrong 🤓
You can always be getting a result above average in a series of numbers as long as the nth number is significantly greater than the previous ones. For example, f(x) = x^2 would always be above average for every next number
I like the idea of an infinitely exponentially growing base of users seeking help from some poor call center
This honestly sounds like it could be the basis for a novella
It sounds like something that happens regularly during an update to software with a lot of users.
if it is considering the average for all of history, then the rate of change would just have to be consistently greater than 0, right ?
deleted by creator