• @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    -2
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Click through the images…it’s a slideshow with information on each one lol. Who’s not even bothering to open these before posting?

    Here are links to the actual legislation: https://legiscan.com/MI/bill/HB4474/2023

    On there, what is under Subjects?

    Civil rights: sex discrimination and harassment

    Civil rights: sexual orientation discrimination

    • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      41 year ago

      Click through the images…it’s a slideshow with information on each one lol.

      Oh, how about that. So, that slideshow only quotes the same “expert” as the fox news did.

      Here are links to the actual legislation:

      You’re relying on one bigoted alarmist’s deliberate misinterpretation of the law.

      • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        -21 year ago

        The law specifically puts “gender identity” as a protected class for this legislation. Why do you think that is?

            • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              21 year ago

              It means they’re protected by the law. Not this sky-is-falling nonsense from one guy whose job it is to scream sky-is-falling nonsense.

              • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                cake
                link
                fedilink
                -21 year ago

                Right, so the changes they made to the law mean that someone can be charged for misgendering…….which is the point that you guys are saying isn’t true.

                • @Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  01 year ago

                  Right, so the changes they made to the law mean that someone can be charged for misgendering…

                  According to one guy who is deliberately misinterpreting the law because he’s a bigoted alarmist who doesn’t want trans people having any legal protections at all. You keep ignoring this.

                  • @Whirlybird@aussie.zone
                    cake
                    link
                    fedilink
                    01 year ago

                    I’m sure you don’t even see the irony in saying that’s just one persons opinion of it, like a random staunch democrat voters opinion isn’t biased in one direction.

                    What you mean to say is that you disagree and think the law won’t be enforced that way. The law makes it possible to enforce misgendering as hate speech.