@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 7 days agoI just cited myself.mander.xyzimagemessage-square231fedilinkarrow-up1819arrow-down143
arrow-up1776arrow-down1imageI just cited myself.mander.xyz@fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish • 7 days agomessage-square231fedilink
minus-square@Crozekiel@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglish18•7 days agoThat’s the best explanation of this I’ve ever seen, thank you!
minus-square@zarkanian@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglish8•edit-27 days agoThat’s more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing. 3/3 = 0.99999… 3/3 = 1 If somebody still wants to argue after that, don’t bother.
minus-square@Dagrothus@reddthat.comlinkfedilinkEnglish6•edit-26 days agoNah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333… which can be done using the ‘convoluted’ but not so convoluted proof
That’s the best explanation of this I’ve ever seen, thank you!
That’s more convoluted than the 1/3, 2/3, 3/3 thing.
3/3 = 0.99999…
3/3 = 1
If somebody still wants to argue after that, don’t bother.
Nah that explanation is basically using an assumption to prove itself. You need to first prove that 1/3 does in fact equal .3333… which can be done using the ‘convoluted’ but not so convoluted proof