@starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish • 7 days agoAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.devimagemessage-square341fedilinkarrow-up11.15Karrow-down133
arrow-up11.12Karrow-down1imageAnon thinks about Googleprogramming.dev@starman@programming.dev to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish • 7 days agomessage-square341fedilink
minus-squareDoglinkfedilinkEnglish-1•6 days agoYou consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
minus-square@pumpkinseedoil@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilink2•6 days agoWhy would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, … Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
You consider that a good thing… Phones shouldn’t have this much RAM.
Why would higher RAM be a bad thing? That’s like saying phones shouldn’t have more storage, faster processors, better camera, …
Sure, they worked before that already. But isn’t technological advancement still good?
To a certain point.