• @samus12345@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    272 months ago

    I’m something of a grammar Nazi, but just like I support letting “whom” die, “less” and “fewer” might as well just be interchangeable. There’s no loss of language utility in doing so, unlike “literally”'s tragic demise.

      • @samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        42 months ago

        I’m aware, but it was done so sparingly, as opposed to being used to mean its opposite far more than its original meaning nowadays.

        • @Jiggle_Physics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          22 months ago

          That is how language works. It starts off small, then it catches on over time, and after a long time has passed, it either gets filtered out, or it becomes commonly used. The case for literally being used, for reasons other than its original one, started a couple hundred years ago. Today it is super commonly used that way, as it didn’t get abandoned. You are mad at the nature of the beast.