• Muntjac@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Grossi asserted that he “didn’t see that kind of development” on the ground, but also that “anything can happen, that is what worries me”.

    IAEA is not confirming it, but I think it’s a stretch to get “pure deranged nonsense” from that quote.

                • PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@lemmy.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  8
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The leading theory with the nord stream pipeline explosion is that putin ordered it to make “business as usual” not an option for those in russias political sphere who would have prefered the resumption of gas to europe over Putins goals in Ukraine. no pipeline, no way back. ultimately no one knows for sure who did it but thanks for bringing it up.

                  “Now slowly admissions are coming out that it wasn’t Russia.”

                  nope. Russia is still the lead suspect.

                  Russia blew up the nova khakovka dam in an attempt to stop Ukrainians launching amphibious assaults accross the dniepr and taking their land back.

                  Now that Ukrainians have a foothold on the left bank of the dniepr near Kherson all of a sudden there is talk of a radiation release from the NNP conveniently placed westwards of kherson with easterly and south easterly prevailing winds.