• otp@sh.itjust.works
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    5 months ago

    I mean there’s having a discussion and then there’s just dishonest refusal to even acknowledge an opposing view.

    Lol what does “having a discussion” look like to you? Maybe asking questions like “Why…?”, literally presenting an opportunity for someone to answer the question? Because maybe you need to re-read my initial comment.

    You can’t fathom a reason people might be concerned about children being given non-medicinal drugs that block puberty?

    Puberty blockers are being offered in a medical context, generally after extensive work with the patient. These aren’t hormones being bought over the dark web and taken (or administered) in secret.

    There’s also a difference between being “concerned” (which the Doctors ARE…hence why these aren’t over-the-counter substances), and wanting it made illegal.