ylai@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agoStudy finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square137fedilinkarrow-up1437arrow-down126cross-posted to: programming@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
arrow-up1411arrow-down1external-linkStudy finds 268% higher failure rates for Agile software projectswww.theregister.comylai@lemmy.ml to Programming@programming.devEnglish · 6 months agomessage-square137fedilinkcross-posted to: programming@lemmy.mlhackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fans
minus-squarelemmyvore@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·6 months agoHow did they know how to break things down into tasks? How did they know if a task would fit in a sprint? 😄
minus-squareKissaki@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·6 months agoWe’re so agile the sprint became a time-block framework rather than a lock-down of tickets that we certainly will finish. (In part because stuff comes up within sprint.)
How did they know how to break things down into tasks? How did they know if a task would fit in a sprint? 😄
We’re so agile the sprint became a time-block framework rather than a lock-down of tickets that we certainly will finish. (In part because stuff comes up within sprint.)