fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agoCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzimagemessage-square151fedilinkarrow-up1967arrow-down152cross-posted to: opticalillusions@feddit.nl
arrow-up1915arrow-down1imageCursed wretched marketingmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square151fedilinkcross-posted to: opticalillusions@feddit.nl
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoI wasn’t saying everyone was looking at the same image. I’m saying the optical illusion still works when using a single image.
minus-squarebolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoSure but I never disputed that. I’m saying this effects are real and there was some confusion due to the above.
minus-squarexthexder@l.sw0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 months agoYou disputed that right here: It’s not accurate to say we were all looking at the same image with the dress. Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
minus-squarebolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-24 months agoI’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?
I wasn’t saying everyone was looking at the same image. I’m saying the optical illusion still works when using a single image.
Sure but I never disputed that. I’m saying this effects are real and there was some confusion due to the above.
You disputed that right here:
Why would you bring this up if not because of my comment?
I’m saying I didn’t dispute the optical illusions/visual fuckery occurring. That’s not incompatible with the other contributing factors I listed. Does that make sense?