• pancakes@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 months ago

      I’m not a furry or into loli stuff but I think there’s a big difference. Furries do closely resemble adult human bodies in every way, however lolis resemble human children.

      • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        5 months ago

        Of course you think there’s a different, you’re into sexy animals, not sexy children.

        You don’t see how they’re the same. They are the same type of thing. Sorry kiddo. Hate to break it to you.

        • pancakes@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          5 months ago

          Lol did you even read my comment? I’m into neither furries or loli. Perhaps you have a hard time reading from up there on your high horse.

    • AVincentInSpace
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      The only difference between pantie shots of underage girls in anime and those in real life is the fact that one is on a screen. People who get off specifically to the fact that these characters are underage have no excuse for doing so besides being into children in real life. It is specifically their youth and by extension their lack of ability to give meaningful consent (because they treat anyone older than them as an authority figure) which, to a certain class of degenerate, makes them attractive.

      If a real-life man who was short and had a childlike face was in a bar complaining about how his wife left him, and someone else in that bar thought he was hot, no one would begrudge them for it, because he’s an adult. So it is with furries. We see that animals are not intelligent and cannot give consent and ask ourselves “what if they were intelligent? what if they looked human? what if they stopped being animals in any meaningful way besides having fur?”

      • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        🙄 everyone sees you as loving beastiality. It doesn’t matter how much you defend it as fictional. Porn is fictional too. Furries are engaging with it and making it thier personality. It’s beastiality in the eyes of everyone that sees you. That’s it.

        You can go on and on about it as much as you’d like. All I’m seeing is bullshit excuses, same as everyone else sees it.

        • AVincentInSpace
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          5 months ago

          Everyone, huh? Check the vote counters on any of the comments in this thread.

            • AVincentInSpace
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              5 months ago

              Multiple people have replied to you defending me and led by saying they weren’t furries. Why can’t you just admit you’re the only one who thinks they’re disgusting?

              • PythagreousTitties@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                4
                ·
                5 months ago

                Oh, my bad. Multiple people that are a into sexualizing animals have defended you. It must be ok then!

                Fuck off