jeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agoLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square118fedilinkarrow-up1262arrow-down19
arrow-up1253arrow-down1external-linkLawyers for ‘Rust’ armourer move to get case dismissed after Baldwin trial collapseswww.independent.co.ukjeffw@lemmy.worldM to News@lemmy.world · 5 months agomessage-square118fedilink
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·5 months ago on more than one occasion talk directors out of using prop firearms that fire blanks That sounds like extremely bad advice. I’m curious, why do you consider substituting a non-operational (filled barrel) firearm for an operational firearm extremely bad advice?
minus-squareBuffalox@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·4 months agoObviously because an operational firearm is way more dangerous.
minus-squareSoleInvictus@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-24 months agoOhhh, I was interpreting the meaning in reverse! I was flabbergasted on why anyone would think an operational firearm is safer than an inoperative prop.
I’m curious, why do you consider substituting a non-operational (filled barrel) firearm for an operational firearm extremely bad advice?
Obviously because an operational firearm is way more dangerous.
Ohhh, I was interpreting the meaning in reverse! I was flabbergasted on why anyone would think an operational firearm is safer than an inoperative prop.