• Canuck1701@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    Yes, they should just pay to have extra planes sitting in a hanger all year that they only take out for high travel periods /s

    • TemporaryBoyfriend@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Maybe they shouldn’t sell tickets to seats on planes that don’t exist or aren’t in service.

      That aside, many companies are now trying out the latest management craze… ‘Run to fail’… That is, running equipment until it fails (and fucks everything up) is cheaper than doing regular maintenance. They don’t care about the pressure and stress it puts on employees or customers, they just care that it saves a couple bucks.

      • zephyreks@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        JetBlue doesn’t overbook and they have similar load factors to the big US legacy carriers, so it’s clearly possible to not overbook

      • Canuck1701@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        Do you not understand that the supply (number of planes) is constant throughout the year, while the demand (number of fliers) fluctuates? If the supply enough planes for everyone to fly at peak times there’s going to be tooons of empty seats throughout the rest of the year. They’d then need to raise everyone’s ticket prices to pay for those extra empty planes, and people just aren’t willing to pay the extra price for the convenience.

        • cygnus@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Please explain to us why they are selling so many more seats than they have available.