• Ibaudia@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      She provided direction to a public library that does not follow the book ban. She is not telling or directing her students to read porn. She is, objectively, promoting free and open access to a public library. There is no other way to characterize that.

      Also, even the most controversial books on the banned list are not “pornographic”. Containing sexual themes or imagery does not qualify something as porn. Porn exists for sexual gratification, and none of those books exist for that purpose.

      You also still have not answered my question as to whether or not you think these people actually want to rape kids, or if you are just playing word games.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Sex education isn’t pornography, and as a general rule depictions of nude people isn’t sufficient to be considered pornography. Moreover, comprehensive sex education has a strong correlation with reduced teen pregnancy. The only reasonable conclusions that can be drawn from that is that sex education isn’t required for teens to have sex, and that sex education increases the odds that teenagers will engage in safe sex rather than unsafe sex.