Found here: https://twitter.com/CarsRuinedCity/status/1677005785862406144?t=Xolo43mUk4GnegFQE19q3g&s=19

Caption: Photo collage of a beach in Alexandria, Egypt, showing a progression in 3 images:

  1. Alexandria “Problem” - empty beach + walking street + 6 lane road with medium traffic + dense mid-rise buildings (likely housing)
  2. Alexandria “Solution” - empty beach (doesn’t seem to matter) + narrower walkway or sidewalk + 10 lane brand new and empty road + tiny sidewalk + the same buildings
  3. Alexandria “Results” - crowded beach + crowded beach walkway + traffic jam on the 10 lane road
  • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
    32·
    1 year ago

    Well yes, but no.

    An infinity wide road has no traffic, but the first time you try to connect your magic highway to real exits and local streets, you are stuck again.

    By this I’m pointing out that it isn’t the road itself causing traffic in isolation, it’s the real world bottle necks anywhere this new highway connects to things.

    Add in induced demand (people taking new trips) and now you have more people trying to fit down the same offramps, local streets and parking lots than you did in the first place.

    • mondoman712@lemmy.mlEnglish
      4·
      1 year ago

      An infinitely wide road couldn’t be effective unless it was also infinitely long. Cars enter and edit at one edge, and transferring lanes reduces capacity, so adding lanes had diminishing returns.

      • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
        1·
        1 year ago

        Indeed, but the width of the highways doesn’t create that effect, the logic surrounding “exits at the edge” does. Totally agree with the diminishing returns

    • BrooklynMan@lemmy.mlEnglish
      31·
      1 year ago

      all you’ve illustrated is that the only place my statement doesn’t apply is in a theoretical (and impossible) fantasy, but you do then go on to explain the means by which what I said is true.

      so… thanks?

      • GBU_28@lemm.eeEnglish
        13·
        1 year ago

        It’s a conversation bro. We agree about some parts and have other thoughts about other parts.

        It’s not the width of the highway that CAUSES the traffic alone, it’s the bottlenecks and access. It’s not the induced demand alone that causes the issue, it’s the offramps and local streets that ruin the new highway.

        • BrooklynMan@lemmy.mlEnglish
          21·
          1 year ago

          It’s not the width of the highway that CAUSES the traffic alone, it’s the bottlenecks and access. It’s not the induced demand alone that causes the issue, it’s the offramps and local streets that ruin the new highway.

          I’m pretty sure I thanked you explaining how my initial statement was correct.

          It’s a conversation bro. We agree about some parts and have other thoughts about other parts.

          and I’m enjoying the conversation, bro. your “other” thoughts seem to be an explanation of how my statement is correct and why.