• PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    That’s only true if you live in a swing state. If your state’s certain to go one way or the other, vote your conscience, even if it’s a write-in.

    • Krakatoa@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      1 year ago

      I would argue the opposite. An increasing minority vote/poll in a “safe” state would pull resources away from swing states to keep the state “safe”. Not many people would have imagined Georgia going blue in federal elections but here we are.

      • PostmodernPythia@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If things are bad enough that NY goes red, how I voted is the least of our problems.

        I mean actually red or blue states. Georgia’s dynamics have been moving centerward for years, and people who pay attention to that stuff knew that.

        • reverendsteveii@beehaw.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Same with Texas, down to the fact that their attorney general was bragging about preserving republican minority rule by preventing the “wrong” people from voting.

    • Bleu [they/them]@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      1 year ago

      I live in Texas (a state that will go a certain way) and I will vote Dem. It makes no sense to me to help make a bigger gap between the Republicans and everybody else just because the Dems suck too.

      The “principled stance” a protest vote makes only helps embolden the current political hellscape within my own state. If I can chip away at the Republican power structure, I will do it.