• BertramDitore@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I don’t think anyone has ever seen Trump laugh in public. It’s pretty damn strange if you think about it. A little smirk or sarcastic chuckle doesn’t count, I’m talking genuine laughter.

      • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 months ago

        It’s a relief to have a candidate who can actually walk down a short set of stairs without assistance or stumbling.

  • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think many were before. Just because someone did not feel biden needed to drop did not mean they would be unsatisfied with harris.

    • knightly the Sneptaur
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 months ago

      The idea that Biden didn’t need to drop out was where they went wrong.

      Everyone who didn’t want Biden to drop out needs to reevaluate how they look at politics, because the benefits of doing so should have been extremely obvious even without hindsight.

      • Eccitaze@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        5 months ago

        I was one of those that thought biden shouldn’t drop out, because I was worried about the risk of infighting breaking out over who would replace him, distracting everyone and driving away voters, and I was also concerned about throwing away the incumbent advantage. I still feel the risks of that happening were real and valid, but I’m immensely pleased that those worries didn’t come to pass and everyone immediately unified behind Harris.

        • knightly the Sneptaur
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          5 months ago

          Those risks were indeed real, but they were also much, much less likely than you feared because the DNC is not the democratic institution it pretends to be.

          Support was always going to immediately solidify behind Harris because she’s an incumbent, has access to Biden’s PAC, and the DNC chairperson is a Biden appointee. If there was another candidate who could have contested Harris they’d have already contested Biden during the aborted primary.

          Right now, the election is still a toss-up, but it won’t stay that way. The next couple of weeks will show Harris on track to come out just ahead in the electoral college, and the results of the election depend on whether or not the Republicans can reclaim the initiative in time to swing the needle back.

          The real question, regardless of who wins, is the Republican party establishment itself. Tensions between the party’s wealthy financiers and the right-wing culture warriors they depend on for electoral relevance have never been higher. Winning the presidency might prolong the status quo a little longer, but I don’t see how they can resolve this fundamental conflict amicably. How long can the house stand divided against itself, and who will rise to challenge the Democrats from the Left once they’re gone?

          • HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 months ago

            this sounds a bit like survivorship bias. Because the outcome has been good does not mean risks where less likely. That being said for myself it was not about risk per se but more I just liked him over any realistic possibility including harris. that being said I see little difference between voting for harris as vice president or potential president given the age and directly for president. so ultimately its fine.

      • knightly the Sneptaur
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        I feel like Cassandra 'cuz I keep getting downvotes whenever I speak true prophecy or ask people to use hindsight to reckon with why their judgements were incorrect.

        • distantsounds@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 months ago

          There is a blue flavor of the MAGA mindset. Just say don’t want your tax dollars supporting an active genocide and watch those downvotes pile up

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            5 months ago

            Ignorant take.

            Huge post yesterday about Israel blowing up a water facility.

            All the comments “durrrr, another one? See it’s genocide!”

            No. It’s the same one fifteen other people have posted about it’s still based on an unverified second-hand “report.” Still doesn’t give enough details to verify underlying story is even based on real places or events.

            It’s Iranian- and Qatari- sponsored lawfare, seeping into the media discourse through repetition. And it really drowns out the handful of legit war crimes and murders that have occured.

            • ???@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              5 months ago

              link

              It’s okay to be wrong. You can still change. Extremism in Israel is off the rails. The Israelis themselves are showing you the crimes they commit.

              • ???@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                5 months ago

                @JustZ@lemmy.world

                Did you check the link? What is your excuse for Israeli crimes today, now that we know it definitely happened on the hands of the IDF?

  • Media Bias Fact Checker@lemmy.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    5 months ago
    Associated Press Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

    Associated Press is rated with High Creditability by Media Bias Fact Check.

    Bias: Left-Center
    Factual Reporting: High
    Country: United States of America
    Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/

    Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


    Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
    Please consider supporting them by donating.

    Footer

    Media Bias Fact Check is a fact-checking website that rates the bias and credibility of news sources. They are known for their comprehensive and detailed reports.

    Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
    If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.