Something I’ve wondered about since that ruling came out, given that they didn’t really specify what acts were official ones, is if another court could effectively render that ruling meaningless, by ruling something to the effect of “Only acts that do not violate any laws are considered to be official acts”
Something I’ve wondered about since that ruling came out, given that they didn’t really specify what acts were official ones, is if another court could effectively render that ruling meaningless, by ruling something to the effect of “Only acts that do not violate any laws are considered to be official acts”
“bUt MuH uNiTaRy ExEcUtIvE tHeOrY!!!”
-some federalist society weirdo.
It would likely head back to the supreme court to decide.