• filoria@lemmy.mlOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    74
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 months ago

    IMF: your housing market is collapsing

    China: yeah we know

    IMF: so how about you bail out those poor housing investors

    China: …no thanks

    IMF: surprised Pikachu

    • Shard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 months ago

      Majority of those housing investors being the common people who are buying homes…

      • VeganPizza69 Ⓥ@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        This isn’t about people getting a place to live, this is speculation, like Bitcoin, but with housing. There’s a mass of people buying housing to commodify it by selling it later at a huge price or by renting it out. This mass of people got scammed by housing developers who promised to deliver the apartment or house (at a good quality). Unfortunately, that didn’t happen; developers ran ponzi schemes. They used investors’ money to start new constructions and attract new investors, and stopped working on the old constructions or finished them poorly with bad materials.

        This is how capitalism works unregulated. So the small investors fucked around trying to become petite bourgeoisie, and they’re finding out the beauty of capitalism.

        I know this is hard to hear for Americans, but if you’re making money from being a landlord or flipping houses, you’re a piece of shit.

        Bailing out these investors would be like bailing out Bitcoin “common people” investors when the “currency” crashes.

        edit: grammar

        • johnyma22@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          2 months ago

          If you buy a derelict house(that no human can possibly live in) and fix it up to a decent standard with the intent to sell it, are you still a piece of shit?

        • realharo@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          But the article is specifically talking about unfinished projects.

          So you don’t have a flat to live in either, you have an abandoned construction site.

            • realharo@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              So where do all the renters come from?

              https://www.yicaiglobal.com/news/a-quarter-of-china-city-dwellers-rent-survey-shows - same website that your wikipedia link lists as source

              But none of that is relevant to the article of this post. That article talks about money to complete unfinished projects. It’s in the very first paragraph. There are people who took out loans to buy pre-construction apartments with plans to live there, who are now in trouble.

              • تحريرها كلها ممكن@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                China made the right move here. If you think the IMF is right show me homeownership rates in countries that did as the IMF suggested.

                There are people who took out loans to buy pre-construction apartments with plans to live there, who are now in trouble.

                mostly foreign speculators, what’s wrong with having them lose money?

                There are people who took out loans to buy pre-construction apartments with plans to live there, who are now in trouble.

                you do know that homelessness and lack of affordability in many Western countries has nothing to do with the supply or demand? there are more empty homes than there are homeless people

  • Sauvandu60@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    If it was my country’s government, they would have accepted it without a second thought and the people have no say about it.

    • protist@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      2 months ago

      That’s quite a fantasy you’re telling yourself. A huge portion of China’s people’s wealth is wrapped up in real estate, and tens of millions of stalled residential units have already been purchased by the Chinese people, and that money is now gone, taken by the developers.

      The IMF recommendation here was “to deploy ‘one-off’ fiscal resources to complete and deliver pre-sold properties or compensate homebuyers.” That would literally be rescuing the Chinese people who were burned by developers. Instead, the Chinese government is supporting the tech and manufacturing industries. Don’t pretend like China is some paradise where the common people aren’t getting fucked

      • naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        2 months ago

        Oh no! The millionaire is now not a billionaire… And the developer was sentenced to life in prison.

        Anyway…

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        I don’t know enough about this specific situation. But the history of the IMF and World Bank is such that, if they were to put out a statement saying that the sky is blue, I would immediately go and check if it had somehow changed colour.

      • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Don’t pretend like the average person in China is a fucking real-estate investor. This investment money is from the middle class and up i.e. people who don’t need to be rescued. They’re going to be fine. Even if their investments all go up in smoke, they won’t be homeless. Common people just spend their paychecks and keep a little aside for savings, like everywhere else in the world.

        • andyburke@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          My understanding is many everyday Chinese people bought real estate that wasn’t yet built because demand was so high. Supposedly many of them sunk their whole life savings into units that developers had promised to build at some future point. That point seems unlikely to come if those developers go bankrupt, meaning that some decently large number of everyday people are going to lose their life savings.

          • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            My understanding is middle class Chinese people bought real estate because they wanted passive income from investing in real-estate. China shouldn’t have allowed them to do that but the solution isn’t to bail out these developers. The actual solution is to make sure these people do not end up destitute because they wasted their money on gambling.

          • sunzu@kbin.run
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            2 months ago

            That’s call investnent risk that investors bears why should their losses be subsidized via loans on entire taxpayers?

            Ironic how China is more less interventionist than US now where we bail out the owner class every single time

            • andyburke@fedia.io
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              Sorry, so the people who saved up to buy a home that couldn’t be built until later due to demand are now investors?

              I don’t think they owned any stock in a company.

              They had contracts for homes, right?

              • sunzu@kbin.run
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                2 months ago

                Real estate is an asset class just like any other asset that is traded.

                With respect to them giving money unfront for building, they got scammed. It is a criminal matter. But why should other people socialize their bad choices.

                Bail out mechinsm done in the west is the most retarded way to deal with these issues and it creates incentives for owner class to scam taxpayers.

                • andyburke@fedia.io
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  So you are saying anyone who has a mortgage is the “investor class.”

                  Got it. Think we are done here.