cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/15032962

Alt text: a screenshot of a microblog post with the text “you walking down an alleyway with a gram of weed in your pocket, who would you rather catch you?” Below are two pictures side by side. One of Kamala Harris and the other of Batman.

    • tacticalsugar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      She’s not a cop anymore. She was the DA of San Francisco in 2004-2011, and she was the Attorney General of California from 2011-2017. She was responsible for prosecuting people, and lead an effort to police black and poor families harder. She also was directly responsible for transgender inmates having their gender-confirming surgeries withheld. Also remember that time she mocked people chanting “schools not jails”?

            • tacticalsugar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              3 months ago

              Do you have anything of value to contribute to the discussion, or is your sole issue that Kamala Harris has not ever actually served on a police force?

              • Alexstarfire@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                9
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                3 months ago

                If somehow not serving on a police force makes you a cop then I guess we’re all bastards.

                And yes, that’s really my sole issue. I didn’t think it was going to be controversial to point out that she wasn’t a cop.

                • tacticalsugar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  You do understand that we say “ACAB” because it’s catchier than “I dislike the so-called justice system that does nothing but destroy lives for the state, and that includes cops, lawyers, prosecutors, etc.”, (IDTSCJSTDNBDLFTSATICLPE) right?

                  I bet you also say things like “You can’t call everyone you don’t like a nazi, the nazi party ended decades ago!”

                  I say this with all the kindness in my heart, please log off and go outside.

            • Superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              No, prosecutors prosecute. Prosecutors are not literally cops (duh), but they are a very important part of the criminal ”justice” system. Cops couldn’t put people away without their help

        • tacticalsugar@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          3 months ago

          That doesn’t make her less of a cop though. I don’t even understand your response. You get mad at people trying to push for progress because… Trump is a fascist? I don’t know, your argument doesn’t make sense.

          My choice is easy, because I’m unable to vote due to voter disenfranchisement! But even without that, I’m a chronically ill trans person. I’m unable to get my basic, uncontrolled medication or my HRT because of regressive transphobic and ableist policies that are being made every single day. I don’t really care if it’s Trump or Harris overseeing the trans people being murdered, unhoused, and forced to go without health care.

          Exercise your vote how you wish, but voting is the bare minimum and some of us can’t even do it. Go buy a trans person a pizza or a night in a motel if you want to make the world a materially better place.

          • nublug@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            enforcing a ‘don’t talk about voting ever, only encourage not voting’ anarchist community is sus af. not voting isn’t gonna make the govt disappear. not voting is just laying down and saying ‘do with me what you will’. not voting, especially from anarchists, inevitably gives more weight to explicitly fascist votes. i’d like a world without goverment as well, but we aren’t gonna get there not voting nor by banning people from anarchist spaces who advocate for slowing the rise of more violent fascism. material conditions, bud.

            • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yes totally that one rule in this little corner of Lemmy is totally the driving force behind the rise of fascism.

            • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              enforcing a ‘don’t talk about voting ever, only encourage not voting’ anarchist community is sus af.

              Yeah… That kind of action does not really say “acting in good faith” or seem like supporting anarchic philosophy.

                • nickwitha_k (he/him)@lemmy.sdf.org
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  3 months ago

                  “Anarchism is when vote”

                  In some forms, when needed, yes. See: anarcho-syndicalism.

                  What is contrary to most anarchic philosophy is using power over others to suppress voices that express dissent in good faith. In fact, I can’t think of a branch of anarchism where that’s not outright contradictory to central tenets of the philosophy.

                  • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    3 months ago

                    In some forms, when needed, yes. See: anarcho-syndicalism.

                    Yes.

                    But how does that even resemble the electoral system we have? I don’t tell people to vote or not & I don’t tell people who to vote for. You all can decided that for yourselves, I’m not your master. The no electioneering rule exist for a few reasons one being to stop drive by comments from people who have zero interest in anarchism from overwhelming people who do & it’s not uncommon in anarchist spaces.

            • Superb@lemmy.blahaj.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 months ago

              This is the same problem that libertyhub has, its sus as hell there too.

              I get not wanting straight propaganda or canvassing, but no one is allowed to push back when you say don’t vote? Its just sucks :/

              • Ranger@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                3 months ago

                Who said don’t vote?

                Edit: I don’t tell people to or not to vote you’re all grown up people that can decided that for yourselves.

      • friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        A gram of weed would get you a citation at most in SF back then, but most likely some “get that high school shit out of here” comment.

        Source: I lived in SF back then and had friends who had nearly that exact experience.