As of July 1, in addition to Vermont, four other states’ IDs will face extra scrutiny from police, as they may provide forms of identification to applicants who do not give proof of citizenship or legal status:
Delaware
Connecticut
Hawaii
Rhode Island
The law directs Florida police officers to write a ticket to anyone they pull over who has what is now recognized as an invalid license.
These are the out-of-state license classes included in the list:
Connecticut licenses with the disclaimer "Not For Federal Identification."Delaware licenses that say "Driving Privilege Only" and "Not Valid for Identification."Hawaii licenses that read "Limited Purpose Driver's License," "Limited Purpose Instruction Permit," "Limited Purpose Provisional Driver's License," and "Not Valid for use for official Federal purposes."Rhode Island licenses with the disclaimers "Not for Federal Identification," "Driver Privilege Card," and "Driver Privilege Permit."Vermont licenses that say "Not for REAL ID Purposes Driver’s Privilege Card," "Not for REAL ID Purposes Junior Driver’s Privilege Card," and "Not for REAL ID Purposes Learner’s Privilege Card."So what’s happening is that drivers’ licenses which clearly say they’re not recognized as ID won’t be recognized as an ID? I’m not seeing an issue, then.
You don’t need an ID to drive. You need a driver’s license. And these licenses now suddenly don’t count in DeSantisWorld.
Driving without an ID is not a crime. Driving without a license is. I can see the distinction being lost when you disagree with the person politically though.
The bill specifically states forms of identification, not licenses to drive. I’m not sure identification would fit the definition of full faith and credit, since every state gets to decide what identification means and is required for.
Driver’s licenses are a different story. Those would be respected if valid in another state.
Not saying it’s right, but it’s probably legal.