fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agoNoisemander.xyzimagemessage-square69fedilinkarrow-up1903arrow-down122
arrow-up1881arrow-down1imageNoisemander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 4 months agomessage-square69fedilink
minus-squareClassifiedPancake@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13·4 months agoIs it possible to record those higher frequencies and then turn them down so I can hear how noisy it is for my dog at home?
minus-squareEtterra@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·4 months agoProbably. If astronomers can convert the radio noise stars make into audible sound - and they can - then I don’t see why we couldn’t pitch adjust background noise to human-audible levels.
minus-squarerhandyrhoads@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·4 months agoI’m not 100% on the pitching down bit, but key would be to get a mic that has those frequencies in its range.
minus-squareProgrammingSockslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-24 months agoYou also need to have a sampling rate that’s equal to 2x the highest frequency you want to capture.
Is it possible to record those higher frequencies and then turn them down so I can hear how noisy it is for my dog at home?
Probably. If astronomers can convert the radio noise stars make into audible sound - and they can - then I don’t see why we couldn’t pitch adjust background noise to human-audible levels.
I’m not 100% on the pitching down bit, but key would be to get a mic that has those frequencies in its range.
You also need to have a sampling rate that’s equal to 2x the highest frequency you want to capture.