rambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agoRustulesh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1256arrow-down10
arrow-up1256arrow-down1imageRustulesh.itjust.worksrambling_lunatic@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squarePlop@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoConst generics are already stable. Do you mean const inline or const expressions on type level?
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoSorry, I was thinking of other features covered by the Const Generics Project Group, like generic_const_exprs.
minus-squarePlop@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoHas there been any progress on that? The projects repo seems somewhat dead.
minus-squareGinny [they/she]@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoThere seems to be a couple of people keeping the lights on at the project zulip but they are presumably busy with other things.
minus-squarePlop@lemmy.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoAh okay! Would love to see a stable generic_const_expr one day.
Const generics are already stable. Do you mean const inline or const expressions on type level?
Sorry, I was thinking of other features covered by the Const Generics Project Group, like generic_const_exprs.
Has there been any progress on that? The projects repo seems somewhat dead.
There seems to be a couple of people keeping the lights on at the project zulip but they are presumably busy with other things.
Ah okay! Would love to see a stable generic_const_expr one day.