(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agoWatrule tensionfiles.catbox.moeimagemessage-square47fedilinkarrow-up1957arrow-down10
arrow-up1957arrow-down1imageWatrule tensionfiles.catbox.moe(⬤ᴥ⬤)@lemmy.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zone · 3 months agomessage-square47fedilink
minus-squareBallsandBayonets@lemmings.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up23·3 months agoThat’s actually exactly why it’s a bad cleaning agent, at least for sterilization purposes. It evaporates before it can kill any microbes.
minus-squareDaxtron2@startrek.websitecakelinkfedilinkarrow-up21·3 months agoYeah if you’re using high percentage isopropanol it’s less effective. I think the current recommendation is 70% for sterilization purposes as it remains in contact longer. Higher percentages is more for its use as a solvent or cleaning electronics.
minus-squaresneekee_snek_17@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·3 months agoI thought the 70% was recommended because it helps maintain membrane fluidity or something like that
minus-squareLarmyOfLone@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·3 months agoYeah or something with hydrophilic properties with the water help destroy microbes. I love reading about chemistry but keep forgetting.
That’s actually exactly why it’s a bad cleaning agent, at least for sterilization purposes. It evaporates before it can kill any microbes.
Yeah if you’re using high percentage isopropanol it’s less effective. I think the current recommendation is 70% for sterilization purposes as it remains in contact longer. Higher percentages is more for its use as a solvent or cleaning electronics.
I thought the 70% was recommended because it helps maintain membrane fluidity or something like that
Yeah or something with hydrophilic properties with the water help destroy microbes. I love reading about chemistry but keep forgetting.