• essteeyou@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    So, wading in here with a gut reaction and no nuance, he’s charged with all these crimes because the platform he runs has them being organized between its users?

    Who do we arrest if a crime is organized via phone call on T-Mobile’s network, or via mail?

    Is it a case of cooperation, where Telegram is completely refusing to help, or is it just a case of “encryption bad, privacy bad” from the French government?

    • AnAmericanPotato@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      60
      ·
      2 months ago

      Who do we arrest if a crime is organized via phone call on T-Mobile’s network

      I guarantee you, T-Mobile does not hesitate to hand over any and all data they have to the government. And they don’t encrypt shit, as evidenced by their many many data breaches.

      or via mail?

      The postal service is from a different era, and has legal protections I wish online equivalents had. Logically they should. Realistically they probably never will.

    • funtrek@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      2 months ago

      A service provider is not responsible for the content people publish on their service. But if they knowingly allow criminals to publish and refuse to cooperate with courts and police, they become responsible.

      • Kyrgizion@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        2 months ago

        But the level of cooperation required means they have to break eee to remain in the clear. Doing that means they lose almost all reason to exist in the first place. This is a no-win scenario.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      2 months ago

      Is it a case of cooperation, where Telegram is completely refusing to help, or is it just a case of “encryption bad, privacy bad” from the French government?

      On the same disclaimer, I’m betting on the latter.

      • themarty27@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        Allegedly the former. By “allegedly”, I mean that Telegram is definitely uncooperative in moderation of illegal content, the alleged part is that that is the motivation behind the arrest. I also read somewhere that he was accused of tapping into Macron’s manager’s communications, but I can’t find the article and I don’t know how reliable that statement is.

        • THX-1138@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          also read somewhere that he was accused of tapping into Macron’s manager’s communications, but I can’t find the article and I don’t know how reliable that statement is.

          So in turn… your comment is just as unreliable.

    • 1984@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      I don’t know anything about this but when USA calls someone a terrorist, it’s always about money or power in some form.