• finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    2 months ago

    Lmao

    Mutual defense and deterrent to invasion by hostile world powers both in and outside of NATO is a bad thing? Sure, okay pal.

    • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      It’s an alliance between Imperialist countries, and the alliance itself has Nazi origins and has had Nazi leaders. Yes, it’s a bad thing, because Imperialism is a bad thing.

      It’s a gang of countries that hyper-exploit the Global South in mutual defense against said Global South.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        It’s literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

        Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

        • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          2 months ago

          It’s literally only function is a deterrent to war, including by members against others as they will not gain NATO support unless they are attacked.

          It’s expansionist against the wishes of outside countries, and NATO exerts military pressure on the Global South.

          Its members might exploit, but thats a meaningless statement about NATO itself because without NATO there would literally be more war.

          Bzzzzt wrong. NATO’s only function is to preserve Western Hegemony and dominate the Global South militarily, so that member-States can continue exploiting ruthlessly unopposed. This results in proxy wars, such as the Israeli genocide of Palestinians.

          • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            It’s expansionist against the wishes of outside countries

            this isn’t super accurate, joining nato has some pretty strict requirements, and besides yeeting NATO would be like the west completely nuking china and russia because “they did a human rights violation” it’s just a dogwhistle lmao.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Its not expansionist because you have to request to join.

            The only objecting countries whose wishes you’re referring to are nations who want to invade potential NATO members.

            • Cowbee [he/him]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              2 months ago

              Its not expansionist because you have to request to join

              Bzzzzt wrong. NATO is expansionist because it pressures non-member states and routinely starts proxy wars.

              The only countries whose wishes you’re referring to are nations who want to invade potential NATO members.

              Bzzzzzt wrong. Western Hegemony damages the Global South and NATO keeps member-states unaccountable.

              • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                2 months ago

                You’re accusing America of causing Russian annexation of Crimea and subsequent war on Ukraine?

                You think Russia is working for NATO?

                Pressuring people into a mutual defence pact lol such an evil thing lol