• TassieTosser@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I want to see all political advertising and donations banned outright with all parties getting an allocated budget from the AEC.

  • just_kitten@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    A step in the right direction but still weaksauce compared to WA banning them outright. They ruin not just the lives of gamblers and their families but also pub culture in general.

    • LatinVelvet@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      So true regarding pub culture. (And of course ruining lives)

      I was about 25 when pokies were brought into Victoria. So many pubs in the suburbs which had live music soon shut down temporarily, and when they reopened they were all pokies venues.

      It was very damaging for the live music scene.

  • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Premier Daniel Andrews said the changes would give Victoria the toughest electronic gambling restrictions in Australia.

    Tas is limiting our cashless gambling card to $100 per day, $500 per month and a soft cap of $5,000 per year. I’d say you gotta try harder, Dan. You can tell it’ll be effective because the hospitality and gaming industries are big mad about it.

      • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        The cards are ostensibly tied to your identity so I guess the penalties for fraud and/or identity theft is a barrier to having multiple cards. There is supposed to be a guest card system for out-of-state gamblers but those have an expiry date.

    • Voli@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What this will mostly do is increase the underground gambling world, addiction is not something you fix by putting a limitation.

      • beatle@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is true, however underground gambling is typically card and table games.

        What this could do is stop grandma from putting $400 through a machine after going to a venue for the $8 roast of the day.

      • TassieTosser@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        It still works as a harm reduction measure. As with all things, making things more difficult decreases the amount of people that do it. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good. Every little bit of pressure on these vices helps strangle the industry.

  • MortyMcFry 🇦🇺@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    $100 at a time. You can still put in $1000s in one session

    EDIT: Actually I thought about it and at least you can only lose $100 at a time. It’s still a mess

  • SituationCake@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Was in Crown a few weeks ago. Hadn’t been there in 10 years, was there for a friends dinner. Out of curiosity walked through the gaming floor. There were SO MANY pokie machines. It was shocking to see. So sad for the people using them. I couldn’t help wondering how many were loosing their savings.

  • Aesecakes@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I used a poker machine once. Put in $5//10 came out on top by $5/10. Never touched one again. Drive them all into the desert and drop a bomb on them, IMO.

    • Nath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I did a similar thing on my first visit to Vegas. I put a quarter into a slot machine because I was a tourist. I won $25 and cashed out straight away.

      The casino still got that money back though, I spent it on the New York New York rollercoaster.