• Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’ll never be able to check what’s going on on beehaw or hexbear as long as my instance is the one I’m on, but no one should have the power to decide that for me or the other users I’m interacting with.

    Well, that’s a choice Beehaw made. Shouldn’t they be allowed to defederate?

    Quite a few people left Beehaw because of that, which is a sign that the decentralized model is working.

    In your model, how do you deal with spammers, CSAM, trolls etc. ? Should every user do their own moderation for the 47k Lemmy monthly active users? Or should people create shared moderation lists? But then you still come back to the trust issues: do you trust someone else to add a user to a block list?

    • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Allow NSFW content at your own risk, same for users and hosts.

      Block users and communities as you see fit, why should a centralized authority decide for the users? It’s the same thing as Reddit except that there’s a bunch of centralized authorities instead of one.

      I can create my own instance but other instances can decide to not federate with it.

      If admins were the problem on Reddit we should work on making a platform where admins don’t exist at all, not one where there’s just more of them.

      • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Allow NSFW content at your own risk, same for users and hosts.

        I am not talking about NSFW, I’m talking about CSAM. There were a few CSAM attacks last year, some mods had to see some disturbing pictures of pedo pornography, that’s probably not something you want your average user to have to deal with.

        It’s the same thing as Reddit except that there’s a bunch of centralized authorities instead of one.

        Then it’s not the same. You have communities like !yepowertrippinbastards@lemmy.dbzer0.com or !fediverselore@lemmy.ca used to document abuse from admins and mods, and modlogs are public, it’s a drastic change from Reddit.

        Have you ever had a look at Nostr? It only has moderation at the user level, so that might be what you are looking for.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          And those CSAM attacks weren’t prevented by the way it works at the moment so that point is moot…

          • rglullis@communick.news
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            2 months ago

            That people will upload illegal content is basically inevitable, the important thing is that there is someone (other than the original poster) with the authority to remove it.

            • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 months ago

              That’s the server owner’s job, it doesn’t mean they should also have the authority to decide who the users are federated with.

              • rglullis@communick.news
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Holy crap, the point is going completely over your head.

                If having absolute power over the communication channel is so important to you, you can only do that by owning everything. This is not an issue you are going to solve with changes on Lemmy, or Mastodon, or ActivityPub, or XMPP, or anything.

                You are arguing where the line is drawn, but the line is not going to go away. Unless you go full blockchain, there is always some aspect of internet communication that it’s mediated: the server, the internet provider, the domain registrar.

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  If you decentralize the hosting and make it a “public database” where everything is backed up on multiple servers then yes, you can in fact have people hosting the content they want to host without having actual control over the website itself. If they don’t want to host NSFW content then they can filter it, someone else will host it and people can pull it from the database when they browse the website from their favorite front end.

      • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        there’s a bunch of centralized authorities instead of one

        I mean sorry but that’s just what decentralization is, unless you want a fully peer-to-peer protocol which is not realistic at all.

        • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          Or, as I keep suggesting, you make the authority figures have as little power as possible, i.e. the only people with authority are mods so they only have control over communities and don’t have the power to prevent tens of thousands of people from communicating with each other.

          • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            They really have as little power as they can given the constraints. If you don’t want an admin to have power over a lot of people, join a small instance and advocate others do the same.

            It really sounds like you just want to be your own admin though. Maybe a personal instance would be a way for you.

              • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                Well other admins should be entirely in their right to cut you off. Same as anyone should be able to block you. If another admin decides to cut you off, that’s up to them, you can’t stop that and shouldn’t be able to. That is anyone’s freedom.

                But usually it is not a problem, as long as you are reasonable. Why would another admin block you if you are reasonable?

                • Kecessa@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  And what I’ve been saying from the get go is that no one should have that kind of power. That you can get banned from a community is one thing, that you can get banned from all content available on one instance and that one person can decide you’re unable to communicate with tens of thousands of other users just because they don’t like your face? Well that means that Lemmy is no better than Reddit.

                  Post on a community moderated by Lemmy’s main dev to share a political opinion he doesn’t agree with? Say goodbye to all Lemmy.ml users, you’re banned from the whole instance mother fucker! No one should be able to do that in a decentralized system and if that’s what people want from Lemmy then they should stop pretending it’s decentralized because it’s not.

                  • SorteKanin@feddit.dk
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 months ago

                    I think you’re totally misunderstanding how decentralization works. It sounds like you think it should be a free for all and everyone should be free to access everything. But again, the fediverse is about choice. It’s totally okay for an admin to be able to cut off another instance. It’s their instance, that’s up to them. Nobody wants absolute free speech.

                    If you don’t like that, go to another instance that doesn’t do that and if you get cut off from another instance by another admin, maybe consider joining that instance or another instance that isn’t defederated.

                    And consider also that this power is great motivation for everyone to stay nice and well moderated. If you are mean or spammy or whatever, you get defederated. So you better be nice! That’s a great feature if you ask me.