• masquenox@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          18 days ago

          Because Arab lives have no value in Israeli western society.

          FTFY.

          To be fair, Jewish lives also only matters to the west if they are busy murdering brown people.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            17 days ago

            It depends on the Western country - some are much worse than others when it comes to the whole practice of defining people’s worth mainly from their race.

            Some Western nations (maybe most of them in Europe) do tend to see value in all human live, Arab or otherwise, but many to indeed see no value in Arab life.

            If I was to point a finger at the worst in Europe I would say Britain, Hungary, Austria and Germany.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      arrow-down
      83
      ·
      edit-2
      18 days ago

      Terrorism, in its broadest sense, is the use of violence against non-combatants to achieve political or ideological aims.

      While it’s likely there were civilians hurt by this, the target was undeniably Hesbollah. So no, not terrorism.

      • erenkoylu@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        17 days ago

        Israel is a terrorist organization. Radical, fundamentalist Jewish terrorism.

        • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          18
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          18 days ago

          National order isnt based on tit for tat. If someone commits a war crime against you it doesnt mean you get to do it too.

          In my opinion the time of day they chose to blow them shows they wanted as much collateral damage as they could.

          What’s the advantage of making excuses for committing war crimes?

          • Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            18 days ago

            At a certain point it stops being worth it. If sending a brainwashed 11 yo to blow up a checkpoint means you can no longer trust having any technology near you, your family and friends it might cause hesitation.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  15 days ago

                  No I’m saying it won’t stop the fighting because its not a choice they can make. Theres either negotiation or fighting but negotiation only works from equal footing. I don’t like violence and war of course but its not the fault of the group with less bargaining power. The larger group needs to give up power willingly to fix anything. Russia to Ukraine, Israel to Palestine and Lebanon.

          • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            18 days ago

            Is there any time of day it’s not atrocious? Seems like any time would have basically equal risk for collateral casualties.

            To be effective it all had to be at once. It seems that they waited until the pagers were being used to coordinate a fresh wave of rocket attacks with promises of more to come before setting them off.

            • villainy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Is there any time of day it’s not atrocious? Seems like any time would have basically equal risk for collateral casualties.

              Then maybe it shouldn’t be done at all.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                6
                ·
                edit-2
                17 days ago

                Maybe all an army has to do to take over the entire world is bring their families to the front. Can’t shoot back at them because their families are there. So they pretty much win every engagement. Problem solved. No more wars.

                • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  17 days ago

                  And you are saying noone is allowed to fight on their own land, as it endangers the public.

                  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    17 days ago

                    I wasn’t trying to say that at all. Wars are fought where they are fought. It’s up to whoever is in charge of the area to make sure they are evacuated.

                    The people in charge of the area in Gaza (Hamas) do the opposite, that’s why they are designated as a terrorist organization and not legitimate government, such as the taliban in Afghanistan.

                    An illegitimate, criminal organization, that so willfully disregard the public welfare and trust, has no right to fight anywhere.

                    Let’s dispel the bullshit idea that Hamas is fighting for the lives and rights of the Gazan people. If Hamas wants to have a state so bad, they should start by looking out for the interests of their own people instead of constantly leading them into worse suffering. Taking part in international terrorism and killing Jews is more important to the leadership of Gaza then is feeding their people and until it’s not Gaza is irredenta.

            • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              17 days ago

              Because that time of day is when the most people will be out in public. It seems deliberately designed to cause as much damage as widely as possible. Likely to cause fear in the population.

              • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                17 days ago

                They put explosives in the pagers but no shrapnel, so how does your conclusion make sense? If Israel wanted to simply cause mass damage, this would be a most incompetent way to do it.

                  • 【J】【u】【s】【t】【Z】@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    16 days ago

                    Terrorism is illegitimate. Fear is only a small part of one definition of the term.

                    This was an attack by military on military. They were using the pagers to coordinate the rocket attacks against Israel that they e been launching lately.

        • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          18 days ago

          I would agree with this if they somehow only harmed Hezbollah severely. That was not the case.