• ilinamorato@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    105
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    US Government Employee: “Okay, awesome. So that’s a solid contract for the Lunar Lander for NASA. Great doing business with you.”

    Northrop Grumman salesman: “Yeah, sure, happy to help us win the space race against the Soviets!”

    Gov Employee: “Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to go figure out who we’re going to get to build a stealth bomber for the Air Force.”

    Grumman: “Oh, we can do that too!”

    Gov Employee: “Whoa, really? Thanks, that really makes the rest of the week easier. I appreciate it! Now all I need to do is find someone to make some cute little mail delivery trucks for the USPS.”

    Grumman: “You’re not gonna believe this…”

    • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Just to head off any pedantry: I know this isn’t how it went, but it’s funnier this way.

        • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          22
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Yes, hence the disclaimer. Grumman delivered the Lunar Module in 1968, Grumman delivered the LLV in 1986, Northrup delivered the B-2 Spirit in 1987, and the companies combined in 1994.

        • Crackhappy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          2 months ago

          You didn’t pay any attention to their comment trying to head off your pedantry. Did you?

          • candybrie@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            The pedantry is genuinely interesting and contributes to the conversation. It’s not like *it’s or something that’s pedantic for the sake of being pedantic.

          • ilinamorato@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            It’s wild that they actually responded to the pedantry comment with the exact pedantry I was trying to pre-empt.

  • Mossy Feathers (She/They)
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 months ago

    I’m gonna miss the old design. The new one looks like someone smashed it with a looney tunes hammer.

    • 𝕾𝖕𝖎𝖈𝖞 𝕿𝖚𝖓𝖆@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      2 months ago

      Looks aside, I’ll bet visibility is incredible, at least from the front. And I think that at least my mail carrier will appreciate having air conditioning. We still have a lot of the old LLV’s here and it was 105 and humid all summer.

      • Corigan@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        21
        ·
        2 months ago

        Functionally it’s amazing. Totally with you.

        Being able to stand in the back, low step deck, ac/heat! Visibility. And electric for the most part. our couriers deserve it.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        2 months ago

        Being able to stand up inside the vehicle is another huge benefit. And a bunch of them are going to be electric.

    • TheImpressiveX@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      2 months ago

      For context, this is the current design, the Grumman LLV:

      And this is the new 2024 redesign, the Oshkosh NGDV:

      • FilthyShrooms@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        2 months ago

        New design is goofy but I kinda love it, it looks like a cartoon. Also it just screams functionality, the driver can see so much out of that massive windshield

          • Anivia@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            Deutsch
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 months ago

            I’m not surprised. I drive an EV as a delivery vehicle, and it’s pretty much the perfect use case for an EV. No engine that needs to be idles while you are out making deliveries, and regenerative breaking is very useful due to the constant stop and go

        • tauisgod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The old model was named the Long Life Vehicle (LLV) for a reason. Ugly for sure, but rock sold. Designed in an era when the main concern was to last 6 digits on the odometer, powered by the iron duke engine. Moderately efficient at the time of its design in the late 70s, but absolutely dependable.

      • fishos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        I never had a problem with the new, though admittedly goofy, design until I saw this picture. The ground clearance on that looks pretty low. Might just be photo angles tho. Anyone have any videos of these being tested out? Curious how they handle on dirt roads. I’m sure the did factor that into account, just curious is all.

  • Nasan@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    2 months ago

    I have no idea why they sent me a thermonuclear device, I ordered an Xbox controller

  • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 months ago

    They just copied SAAB.

    They tried to give away a SAAB made anti-tank weapon with each vehicle purchase in the US in the 80s and 90s to bolster sales, but were told “that’s not a responsible reaction to road rage.”