• hobovision@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    14 hours ago

    I’m sorry, are you saying that a pipeline from the great lakes to Los Angeles would have to go through less mountains than from British Columbia?

    * gestures vaguely at the entire mountain west *

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Huh. For some reason I thought you could go around the south end without hitting too much, but yah, it’s probably easier to go down the central plateau.

      Ah well, guess BC is fucked.

      • hobovision@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Yeah you could probably find a path through New Mexico and Arizona that’s not too mountainous, like along I-10.

        But really where the US “needs” more water is where all the farms are. The cities don’t use much in comparison. It’s just a lot in a small area compared to the farms distributed in the big valleys.