• givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    The president can order agencies to reschedule it, which makes it defacto legal in a lot of states, and means federal employees in states where it’s legal can use, including military.

    She should do that asap, because the fight to actually legalize is a lot harder.

    I don’t want to see her say it needs to be legalized and then refuse to take any step thats not the hardest

      • ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        51
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        The public comments were overwhelmingly in favor of full deschedule/legalization, but all he’s pushing for is reschedule to 3, which means they’ll probably go to 2 because fuck you that’s why. Hopefully Harris can lean into it a little harder than Biden has.

        • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          39
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          As a senator Harris introduced bills that would’ve fully legalized it. Meanwhile I don’t think Biden ever publicly said he wanted full legalization

          I think there’s pretty good odds she would go further than Biden in executive action alone

          • Bone@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            27
            ·
            2 months ago

            Biden was calling it a gateway drug just before entering the office of president. I don’t believe he’s evolved personally at all. Policy, which is kind of weak, may be another thing. But I don’t think the man sees any value in marijuana, for anybody.

            • Furbag@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              12
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              Is anyone actually surprised that Biden is extremely anti-narcotics given his son’s battle with drug addiction?

              Harris doesn’t have the same baggage. If she were at the helm, I think she’d follow through.

              • Bone@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                14
                ·
                2 months ago

                But that’s just the point. Part of marijuana adoption is getting away from worse drugs. There is plenty of supporting data at this point. The sooner people see this they’ll see where the bar ought to be set. This is only one example of course.

                • Crismus@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  One of the best ways to get through withdrawal symptoms is Marijuana. When I was getting off some pretty rough mental meds, Marijuana allowed me to keep going.

            • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah at best Biden probably only is in favor of it for textile products and maybe CBD derivatives for medical use. Which mind you is still a massive improvement over damned near every president since it was putlawed but still a woefully insufficient, a solid summary of Biden now that I think about it.

            • Kalysta@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              2 months ago

              He’s too old. Society has moved beyond him on this and it’s an example of why we need to start electing younger people.

            • usernamesAreTricky@lemmy.mlOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              15
              ·
              2 months ago

              Plus this post is literally about her going to the “All The Smokes” podcast and calling for legal weed there. Could not imagine Biden doing

        • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          2 months ago

          all he’s pushing for is reschedule to 3, which means they’ll probably go to 2 because fuck you that’s why

          I figure you’re partially joking but they can’t really make it 2. The HHS recommendation was 3 and even the DEA kind of has to agree even if they don’t want to. It would have been super controversial to do something else, they’re mainly supposed to follow it through with the rulemaking process unless they’re willing to make a serious case. And even then it would probably be to leave it where it is.

          One of the theories going around as to why they added the hearing is that they wanted to take the heat off themselves for the call they’ve made by really drawing out the public consultation. Like people will be mad at them for following the recommendation so they want to make a big show of the fact they’re listening to concerns etc.

          Hopefully Harris can take some stronger action or legalize through executive order or something. Schedule III is better but it’s then in the same class as ketamine. No judgement of people who like ketamine but COME ON

          • ilovededyoupiggy@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            2 months ago

            Interesting, didn’t know that about the process, TIL. So am I reading you right that they’re effectively locked into reschedule to 3 no matter what now due to the HHS recommendation? Or do they still have the option to just not change a thing as well?

            • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              2 months ago

              Yeah my understanding is that since HHS said “the science suggests it should be in 3,” the DEA would have a bit of a challenge making any other rule. The schedules (theoretically) tell you what the addiction risk and medical value of a substance is, with lower risk & more effective medicine being the least restricted. So since HHS made that determination and the DEA are not scientists, it would be kind of wild for them to try to argue with that.

              I think technically they could propose anything they like, but 2 would never go through because there’s no basis for it, and I think even keeping it in 1 would be a difficult sell with Biden having called for the review and the recommendation being what it was. Plus as you said most public comments (and experts) said they didn’t go far enough.

              Honestly I think they’re stuck. They probably can’t just come out and recommend descheduling (and going by public statements probably don’t want to) but the current position is untenable. So they have to just sign up for the “better but nobody is especially happy” option HHS gave them

              One thing I wish I understood more was whether Harris could just legalize through an executive order. Biden (and now Harris) said nobody should go to jail for weed but schedule III does not solve that problem at all.

              • Crismus@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 months ago

                The classification problem will lead to the DEA gaining control of all the dispensaries in every state.

                Maybe I’m being alarmist, but rescheduling Marijuana is worse than leaving things alone. Oversight by the DEA is the wrong way to go.

                • OccamsTeapot@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 months ago

                  Yeah I wouldn’t say alarmist but this is likely a non issue. Under the current system, every legal state is breaking federal law in a bunch of ways, but the DEA and other agencies have not acted. Technically putting it in schedule III would mean it could be treated like other substances in that schedule, available only with FDA oversight, but that is not likely. Basically everything has been totally hands off so far, so it’s very unlikely that the government reducing the level of control of cannabis would lead to agencies increasing their control.

                  The biggest threat at the moment imo is a Trump presidency, but based on his comments about Florida’s ballot initiative, his “change with the wind” opinion is currently also in favor of not sending people to jail for it.

        • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          The public comments were overwhelmingly in favor of full deschedule/legalization, but all he’s pushing for is reschedule to 3, which means they’ll probably go to 2 because fuck you that’s why

          The Lesser Evil Party in a nutshell 😮‍💨

          Granted, it’s of course still a MUCH lesser evil than the American Fascist Party, but fucking HELL! Your very bleak guess is probably the best case scenario with these fuckers!

      • Kalysta@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s moving slowly because the DEA and police want it to stay illegal because that’s where half their funding comes from

    • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      Rescheduling is a lot more complicated than that. The president can not just wave a wand and make it legal. Congress could pass a law doing so, but they are not going to do that. The other way is via the Controlled Substances Act which is, to put it mildly, is a cluster fuck.

      In a nutshell, administrative rescheduling begins when an actor—the Secretary of Health and Human Services or an outside interested party—files a petition with the Attorney General or he initiates the process himself. The Attorney General forwards the request to the HHS Secretary asking for a scientific and medical evaluation and recommendation, as specified by 23 USC 811(b-c). HHS, via the Food and Drug Administration conducts an assessment and returns a recommendation to the Attorney General “in a timely manner.” The Attorney General, often through the Drug Enforcement Administration, conducts its own concurrent and independent review of the evidence in order to determine whether a drug should be scheduled, rescheduled, or removed from control entirely—depending on the initial request in the petition.

      If the Attorney General finds sufficient evidence that a change in scheduling is warranted he then initiates the first stages of a standard rulemaking process, consistent with the Administrative Procedures Act. During rulemaking and consistent with Executive Order 12866, if the White House—through the Office of Management and Budget’s Office of information and Regulatory Affairs—determines the rule to be “significant,” it will conduct a regulatory review of the proposed rule—a very likely outcome given the criteria in the EO.

      FYI, Biden already initiated this process to reschedule marijuana in 2022. At this point, it has been reviewed and the Attorney General has submitted a rule change to the DEA. They will have a public comment period which they will no doubt drag out as long as possible. If approved, marijuana will be reclassified at the same level as steroids (schedule III). It is disappointing that Biden only requested changing the schedule rather than descheduling it all together. Not ideal, but a hell of a lot better than now.

      • DancingBear@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        So technically, the president could order the people he is in charge of to deschedule the drug and to do it immediately by everyone agreeing that the change is not significant.

        If they refuse he could just keep firing people until someone agrees.

        • Boddhisatva@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          The law requires certain time frames for comment periods and he cannot just ignore those. He also cannot just fire anyone he wants. That is one of the things Project 2025 includes. Giving the president to fire any federal employee at will is a bad idea.

          The only immediate thing he might do is issue an executive order making Marijuana a very low priority offense and telling DoJ to direct limited enforcement and prosecution resources elswhere.

          • DancingBear@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Well I’m sure the persons in question will be highly motivated to follow through and expedite the process with seal team six accompanying them to work every day

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          Nope, the president doesn’t have the legal authority to give that order. He has the legal authority to order them to consider the question, which is the process that’s going on.

    • foggy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 months ago

      Holy shit the NSA, FBI and CIA will finallyl get competent, weed smoking engineers.

        • foggy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          PirateSoftware’s CEO, Thor, once saidnl in a stream how national security relies on furry conventions flights making it to and from conventions safely, and that there is nearly no bigger single point of failure on our security infrastructure. Those planes go down and we have a serious problem.

          I think he’s right.

          • vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Wait the CEO of PirateSoftware is named Thor? I cant tell if thats extremely cool or extremely dorky, actually its both I named my dog Malcador and have a kitten named Jurgen I cant judge.

            • foggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              I mean it’s both, that dude has a voice pretty close to what you’d want a programmer named Thor to sound like. He runs a ferret rescue. He used to be Red Team for DoD and would Penntest nuclear power facilities, and now runs a gaming studio. Very interesting dude.

              Edit: His father is the WoW guy from South Park. And If you ever got banned from World of Warcraft for cheating, it was Thor’s team that probably caught you.

          • themadcodger@kbin.earth
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            2 months ago

            Wait, are you saying that our national security is run primarily by furries? Serious question, not sure if I’m misunderstanding you.

            • foggy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              That is what Thor implied in the stream I’m scanning for it so I can link it. I found this quickly but struggling to find the thing In referring to.