• Draghetta@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I don’t really understand this seemingly widespread notion - that is also represented in this comic - that nations “agree” to go to war.

    That is not really how it works most of the time, there is usually an aggressor and a victim. It is usually not two powerful leaders butchering their own country’s population, but rather one powerful leader butchering two countries’ population.

    I know it’s not the point of this comic, but this really, really annoys me.

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      It’s a pretty stupid comic actually. The conversation usually goes more along the lines of one nation demanding territory from the other, and the other telling the first to fuck right off.

    • NABDad@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I think WW1 was kind of like the comic. It was a bunch of squabbling family members who got into a pissing match and then sent their citizens to die. It never would have happened if Gramma Vicky had still been alive!

      • Draghetta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Sure, but this comic wasn’t made 100 years ago. It reeks of that “they should BOTH stop fighting!” rhetoric, that only benefits aggressors.

      • marcos@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        The world used to be more like the comic. Now it’s more unilateral.

        But the one important detail never changes.

    • rocket600@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I think your premise is wrong. It’s more plausible that because war is beneficial for the 1 percent, that this song and dance of political theater is purely to keep you and I entertained and in line.

      Or we could go with your idea that Putin thought it was a good idea to piss off the most powerful nations because he wanted to conquer some land. He was like A) I could peacefully hang out on my massive yacht or B) become enemies with a country that is notorious for stealth drone strikes.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I in general agree with what you wrote, but the Israel/Iran brinkmanship does feel a bit like the portrayal in this comic at times. So the comic seems relevant to recent events.

      • Draghetta@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Oh yes, the Middle East is pretty much the reason for my “usually”s and “mostly”s there.

          • Draghetta@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            You could say that - they have been up to a few squabbles as of late, kerfuffles even.

            I am sure it is nothing too serious, it will be over as quickly as it started and the region will soon be as peaceful as always.

        • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Ironically, the modern Middle East is almost entirely a creation of WWI and its immediate aftermath when the Ottoman Empire was carved up by the victorious Allies.

    • index@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      That is not really how it works most of the time

      That is indeed how it works most of the time