• DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 year ago

    how do people on this site not realize that the points next to your posts affect how your posts are sorted and are literally the exact same system as reddit? am i just so blind that i can actually see the numbers next to my posts or is everyone here just trying to be so anti-reddit they’ll make up bullshit that isn’t reality?

    • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      74
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They are talking about karma as a thing you could collect, point totals for all posts added together displayed on your profile. Not the voting mechanism itself.

      • 𝙣𝙪𝙠𝙚@yah.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        51
        ·
        1 year ago

        Lemmy also has this and everyone’s point totals are visible from the API. If you’re not seeing it, that’s because your client is hiding it, not because it doesn’t exist.

        • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The nice thing is though, it’s different for every server and from every server, so unless you follow a convention to say the user’s homeserver vote total is the definitive amount, then there’s no true karma.

          My beehaw account is a great example. I made some comments on Lemmy world before it defederated. World and shitjustworks users can still vote on the old comments but they won’t count to my home total, and from Lemmy.world my vote total won’t change for that account significantly from that point. The vote totals on this lemmy.ca account will be different from lemmy.ca, beehaw.org or lemmy.world’s perspectives because the servers defederated can’t see the karma I earned on each comment on the other server, while lemmy.ca can see both.

          Downvotes are also disabled on beehaw, so any downvotes won’t affect my total at all but could show on other servers.

          Lastly, there are some servers with 40000 accounts and 3 active users (who post and comment), vote botting is feasibly a thing. Imagine if I made a Lemmy server at Rentlar.org and as the admin I made 20000 accounts who upvote me every where I post. I’d be the first user on Lemmy with 1M total votes, but would that mean anything other than I’m a somewhat tech-savvy narcissistic loser? No.

        • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          I believe the devs have said they aren’t going to make it officially visible, which is all I care about. If you want to make value judgements on people based on a number so bad that you had to find a client that shows it, more power to you.

        • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          I hadn’t thought about it until just now but IDK if that number is accurate. My instance doesn’t have downvotes, so if you view my profile from lemmy.one it might look like I have a higher karma than if you look from lemmy.world, I’m not sure.

          Take it all wirh a grain of salt I say

          • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            It wasn’t important on Reddit. Even there you could only lose 15 points on any downvoted comment and you couldn’t lose points for posts. Karma was just a way to measure how frequently you interacted in an additive way. It’s only real utility was for mods to bar new accounts from posting without getting come karma from other places first. and Lemmy definitely needs something like that in the near future for moderation, but they have to fix the bug with the total first.

      • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        And that system was irrelevant on Reddit just like it is here. You still have a total karma number in the API, every app I have used shows it, even if it is broken right now. Only the default theme on the web page hides the number. The only people who saw value in karma are the people who farmed it and the people who bitch about the people who farmed it. Either way, making posts that get a lot of upvotes specifically to get a lot of upvotes happens here just like I does on Reddit so idk what this OP is trying to say because they’re farming karma lol.

        • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          There were many subreddits that did not allow participation unless someone had a karma over a certain threshold. For many of them the threshold was pretty low, only meant to stop brand new accounts and trolls, but still.

          Additionally, the “people who farmed it” often did so because a reddit account with a high karma score was literally worth money to adspammers and people running bots.

          The karma system contributed to what made reddit bad.

          • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            20
            ·
            1 year ago

            You only lost 15 karma on any mass downvoted comment and 0 for posts. The only person who cared about people’s karma was you dude.

            • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              18
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              I don’t see how that addresses any of what I said. If anything this seems like this would mean the subreddits that blocked people with no karma weren’t even doing it to block trolls, just new users.

              I didn’t care about my karma or any specific persons, I like to get into arguments about stuff and that is how you get downvoted. I just don’t like the behaviour a karma system motivated.

              • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                17
                ·
                1 year ago

                If you’re getting downvoted in an argument, guess what, that means you’re bad at making arguments. And this system is exactly the same, regardless of if you can see it or not, sorting by top will still sort by the net sum of votes.

                • LegionEris@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  10
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  If you’re getting downvoted in an argument, guess what, that means you’re bad at making arguments.

                  I pretty much agree with your second sentence/point, but this is bullshit. I got so many downvotes on reddit for literal descriptions of my perceptions and experiences as a gay woman. Half the time there wasn’t even a debate or argument happening. As reddit culture skewed more and more conservative, many technical and nerdy communities became actively hostile to the basic facts of my existence. Then there are all the downvotes I got for believing in human and minority rights while downthread with some bigots. My more visible posts on the same topic would be solidly upvoted, while everything below the arrow was smashed below zero because only angry little shits followed the discussion that far. I agree that the system on Lemmy isn’t meaningfully different and will inevitably have the same effects, but sorting by voting over-centralizes the meta and destroys real discussion and diversity of experience and opinion. It literally only works in limited circumstances within subjects that have objectively correct answers. Anywhere else it introduces so much chaos.

                  • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    6
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I’m not saying people don’t pick sides in an argument, but the point is to convince someone you’re right, so if you’re not doing that, you’re getting downvotes meaning you’re either wasting your time or making bad arguments.

                • Stoneykins@lemmy.one
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  11
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I mean, generally getting downvoted in an argument is a matter of course, at least until people who you aren’t arguing with chime in.

                  Also a lot of what you are saying doesn’t really make sense to me? I feel like I’m not sure we agree what we disagree about.

                  Honestly the shit I got downvoted the most for was just standing up for trans people, reddit is full of transphobes.

                  • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    arrow-down
                    9
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You really don’t seem to understand the mechanics of link aggregators and their comment sections. The votes are for curating content and downvoting posts that are not relevant or are poor quality is the entire point of the system. If you remove the ability to downvote bad content, you degrade the content for all the users. This is exactly why YouTube removing the dislike counter was an issue.

    • Beliriel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Karma is the total of upvotes and downvotes a user receives over time not just single posts and comments. It leads to discrimantory moderation and users tend to whore themselves out for upvotes to boast.
      Ever heard of gallowboob?

        • Goldmage263@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          It wasn’t a 1upvote=1karma system on Reddit. Mostly, Lemmy does it better by the community caring less and not having posts limited if a user is under a threshold.

    • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      Arguably one difference is that on lemmy it’s just a straight up sum AFAIK, while on reddit there are some algorithms attached to tweak things so you can’t lose vast amounts of karma from a single shit comment and such.

      • DMmeYourNudes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        you can only lose 15 points for a comment and 0 for a post. the only thing they do is they jitter the total points to fight botting. its designed to make karma a representation of content given, not necessarily that you have a high hit rate.

    • Arobanyan@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      The initial point of the karma system was to push to the top of discussions relevant information while the shitposts were put at the bottom. It works sometimes, sometimes it doesn’t.

      I think, honestly, politics is the biggest issue here when it comes to the karma system and it doesn’t work well at all within it, but for many other things it’s actually a decent system and a good way to find relevant information in a thread without reading through 500 pages on a forum or something

      Just my 2 pennies

    • Esjee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      13
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Reddit bad lemmy good, you are not allowed to say otherwise.

      Edit: Bruh people on lemmy don’t get sarcasm either 😭

      • BruceTwarzen@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        You can on reddit say what you want. If you really care about the number next to your name you’re just a victim

        • Esjee@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I never changed my opinion just so I get more karma on reddit either.

          Lemmy’s system is no different from Reddit’s and my original comment was sarcastic. I’ve noticed sarcastic posts without /s get downvoted more easily on Lemmy for whatever reason.

          • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            There’s a lot more good faith here. On Reddit you could safely assume anything ridiculous was meant sarcastically, and usually be correct. Here, the sarcasm is not assumed so your comment is more likely to be judged as having been spoken sincerely.

            Which is actually really nice, even if it gets a comment misunderstood from time to time. Reddit just feels shitty and hate-filled anymore. But Lemmy feels a great deal more emotionally neutral, and if I dare say so, human – which is to say, not attempting to increase emotional involvement and generate clicks by being provocative and antagonizing by design.

            EDITED for clarity

    • bloodyknuckles@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      i left reddit to get rid of condescending ass comments like this baby whiney complaining garbage bullshit right here. what the fuck