• Doorbook@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    21 minutes ago

    Democracy, where you have freedom of speech except if you speak about Israel, or your own country war crimes, or your own country foreign policy, or trying to run for office if you are not Democrat or Republicans.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    2016 Michgan election results

    Michigan 2016

    I can’t post more than one image because Lemmy/Memmy makes the images fall apart into a 2 mile long scroll.

      • zephorah@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Even without him, Stein had it handled by herself. Why do you think she’s back? Jr, who was funded by a Repub PAC, dropped out. Then Stein re-appeared.

  • chemicalprophet@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    1 hour ago

    If Kamala loses of course it will be everyone else’s fault. Fucking race/class traitor neolib cop.

  • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    7 hours ago

    !rcv@ponder.cat

    Any third party that’s telling you to vote for them under FPTP, but isn’t heavily promoting RCV to fix the system, isn’t trying to win. They’re trying to spoil the FPTP election.

    RCV is already law in a surprisingly large number of places. It may change the majority in the house in this upcoming election, because the difference in vote-counting within the two states that use it for US congressional elections might be enough to change the razor-thin outcome.

    RCV is on the ballot, in one form or another, in 7 states and DC this year. Go vote. You might be able to fix the system, and move toward the future that all the people in this thread who are being vocal about Jill Stein say that they want. Remember back when marijuana was illegal? That changed. This can change too, and it would be glorious, for a lot of important goals that a lot of people claiming to support Jill Stein claim they’re supportive of. It would be practical and realistic. It would work.

    Anyone in this thread who is saying Jill Stein is extremely important, but haven’t been saying anything about ranked choice voting or changing the voting system to make third parties realistic: Why? What’s your goal, why did you make that decision about your priorities?

    The answer is obvious, of course. But it’s fun to ask.

    @anticolonialist@lemmy.world, why?

    I’ll add more @s as more people pipe up. They always do.

    Register and vote, for RCV as well as for Harris. We have 25 more days.

    https://www.vote.org/

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I love CGP Grey, but he doesn’t really understand politics. Proportional representation is a terrible system and leads to party control and extremists gaining too much power. Something a spreadsheet won’t tell you.

      • JaymesRS@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Paraphrase from Historian Kevin Kruse:

        “No, l’m not voting [for the better one of the two major parties in a first past the post system] this election. But rest assured that when the Trump administration starts arresting my nonwhite neighbors and forcing them onto the trains, I’m going to have a pretty big frown on my face. That way, everyone will know it’s not my fault.”

      • nexguy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Your comment is fascist and while I was reading it my fascist shoes became untied. I would tie then but the strings are fascist. I apologize for using so many fascist letters in my words. At least periods aren’t fascist… yet.

      • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 hours ago

        I didn’t ask whether David Doonan had published a press release on a janky web site which was mostly complaining about Democrats trying to remove Green Party members from the ballot, in this FPTP election. This also somehow finds a way to blame the lack of RCV on the Democrats, when a lot of them support it. Here’s a list:

        https://fairvote.org/our-reforms/ranked-choice-voting/endorsers/

        I don’t see any Green Party people there. I have never heard Jill Stein talk about it, and I’ve heard her say a bunch of things. That’s strange to me. But regardless of that, that’s not what I asked. I also didn’t ask whether you plan to vote for Kamala Harris. My question was:

        Anyone in this thread who is saying Jill Stein is extremely important, but haven’t been saying anything about ranked choice voting or changing the voting system to make third parties realistic: Why? What’s your goal, why did you make that decision about your priorities?

        Do you want to answer that question? You don’t have to. You can change the subject again, if you’d like to.

      • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        33
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Certainly not like the DNC which sued to keep RCV off the DC ballot, or Alexandria county VA which opted not to implement it in 2024 because it might confuse the black community?

        • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 hours ago

          There are a lot of people in politics who are opposing RCV, because it erodes their power. Some of them are Democrats. Sure. That wasn’t my question. My question was, why is the Green Party spending so much energy pursuing a doomed effort which can only elect Donald Trump, and such an infinitesimal amount of energy on advocating for fixing the system in a way that would let them actually get elected in the future?

          It’s a strange allocation of priorities.

          I did look around for things the Green Party has done to support Ranked Choice Voting. You’ve sent me the RV tag search, which has a press release from January 2024 and the one before that, from February 2023, dealing with RCV. Hooray.

          I did find a substantive thing that Jill Stein herself did to support it in 2017, which actually had something to do with Maine putting it into action: https://mainegreens.org/news/in-the-news/107-jill-stein-joins-push-to-save-ranked-choice-voting-in-maine

          That’s good. Why hasn’t she done anything since then? Why is always the focus on attacking the Democrats, and the focus if at all beyond that is a tepid hand-wave in the direction of RCV, when that is the solution that would lead to them being able to get elected? I didn’t look very hard, but I did look, and this was the most recent thing I was able to find since January:

          https://mainemorningstar.com/2024/10/07/green-party-candidate-jill-stein-praises-maine-voting-system-as-means-to-oppose-genocide/

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    2016 Pennsylvania results

    Pennsylvania 2016

    I can’t post more than one image because Lemmy/Memmy makes the images fall apart into a 2 mile long scroll.

  • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    17
    ·
    7 hours ago

    “Once noble party” - ffs.

    Jill Stein is a bad actor in this election, she understands how the electoral college works and she understands she’s weakening the democratic party position. But let’s not blame shift - the Democrats could be much better on climate change then they are today and if they were better Stein’s BS wouldn’t have such an easy time attracting voters. I dislike the title posing it as “Stein may hand Trump the whitehouse again.”

    • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Even if the argument about getting X% of votes was true, the states to campaign heavy in would be the deep blue/red states. Especially since they tend to get ignored by candidates.

      Instead she sticks to the states where <30k votes could decide the election and the market is saturated with the most expensive ad costs

      It’s blantantly obvious what’s she’s doing.

      • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Yeah, that’s the nature of the Electoral College. It sucks. Do you think the Electoral College is something Kamala Harris invented or even wants?

        Hate the game, not the playa.

        • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          I think you replied to the wrong person. And I’m not sure why you had to include a giant screenshot

          Every instance that federates now has to host that. If everyone was this inconsiderate of server space the federverse couldn’t exist.

          • zephorah@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            It wasn’t giant on my end, it looked like 2 thumbnails that broke apart into a 2 mile long post that couldn’t be scrolled, so I deleted it. And then your response appeared.

            • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              6 hours ago

              It’s now posted three times as a parent comment to the thread…

              And the way deletion works on federated instance none of them are likely to be removed…

              So now 4 copies are taking up space on every instance federated with .world, it adds up

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      5 hours ago

      The GOP is the “drill baby drill” party though.

      The Green Party is not going to win. The only message that voting for Jill Stein will send to the Democratic party is they need to move more to the center to get more reliable voters. It’s already heppening. Harris doesn’t like fracking but she’s not going to ban it and she has to talk about increase US oil production to get votes from people she knows will turn up and won’t flake out and vote green or be uncommitted or whatever.

      If she wins she will be more inclined to fulfill promises made to the people who actually voted for her. Sure she’ll need to represent everyone, but there’ll be far more people that voted GOP she’ll need to represent (and entice to maybe vote for her in the next election) than green party voters.

      • aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        38
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        7 hours ago

        funny that with instant runoff voting, your vote would go to a larger party as soon as your fringe candidate got eliminated.

        • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Perhaps, but I’d feel a lot better knowing I was able to vote for my fringe nutjob without handing their fringe nutjob the Whitehouse. And if my fringe nutjob lost, then I could still keep voting for who I truly believe is best. And by the time all my fringe nutjobs were eliminated, and I had to vote for a Democrat again, I’d at least know that we truly and democratically came to that answer. I don’t have to be “right” about the best candidate, but I hate casting a damage control vote that feels like a lie.

          So as it stands, I hate voting, I hate having to vote for Democrats, and I just suck it up and do it anyway because we don’t have the time to collectively push for a better option.

          Plus, if everyone could vote for their fringe nutjob without fear of giving the election to the worst possible option, we might find out that more people support ideas outside of the two party system. Maybe even shifting the Overton window and opening the door for a more representative electorate.

          • Donebrach@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Maybe those grifters should run for lower offices first instead of wasting peoples’ time and money on un-winnable elections that are entirely beholden to what congress’ makeup ends up being.

            • SquirtleHermit@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              Maybe, but since you don’t know who my personal nutjobs are, maybe your assumptions are fundamentally flawed? Maybe they have run for lower office? Maybe they have won elections? Maybe they aren’t grifters, but concerned citizens who truly want to make a difference in the best way they know how? Maybe assuming someone is falling for grifters is a silly way to try and start an internet fight?

              Or maybe I was taken in by a grifter all along and would still benefit from Ranked Choice Voting so I don’t throw away my vote and let Trump back in the Whitehouse? Either way it’s an improvement.

              Fwiw, my personal nutjob is Bernie, and even if he didn’t win, I consider the shift he made in American politics to have value in its own right.

        • adarza@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          edit-2
          7 hours ago

          not when the ballot looks like:

          ___ democrat
          ___ republican
          ___ independent
          ___ independent
          _2_ honest guy without a chance in hell
          ___ who da fk is this guy
          _1_ fringe nutjob

          • WraithGear@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            Run off voting would give the honest guy the greatest chance at winning. There would be no strategic voting, just voting for the one who best represents you, and a bare minimum contingency.

            • chaogomu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              4 hours ago

              Unfortunately that’s not how RCV works.

              There’s a lot of misinformation about RCV, claims that just aren’t supported in reality. And one of those is false claims is that RCV is in any way good for third parties.

              At it’s core, RCV is just a series of First Past the Post mini elections on a single ballot.

              That creates problems.

              • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                4 hours ago

                Unfortunately that’s not how cereal works.

                There’s a lot of misinformation about cereal, claims that just aren’t supported in reality. And one of those false claims is that you can just put cereal in a bowl with milk in it.

                At it’s core, cereal is just a series of very small, crunchy loaves of bread, in a single bowl.

                That creates problems.

      • bobburger@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        So you’re saying that Jill Stein, the Russian asset who is actively working to get Donald Trump elected president, represents you and your group?

        • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          24
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They need to earn votes.

          The Senate investigated that dinner and found nothing. Everything you don’t like isnt always Russian

          • mashbooq@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            4 hours ago

            The Senate investigation found nothing illegal. That doesn’t mean Stein isn’t trying to help russian interests.

          • PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Online trolls from the Kremlin-backed Internet Research Agency used social media to promote Stein’s candidacy during the 2016 campaign, according to an indictment brought by special counsel Robert Mueller against the Russian organization and 13 of its employees. The Russians’ pro-Stein efforts included paid advertisements on Facebook that explicitly encouraged Americans to vote for Stein, according to the indictment.

            A summation of the report’s findings on “comprehensive anti-Hillary Clinton operations” said while the group’s assumed Twitter personas had some pro-Clinton content, “the developed Left-wing Twitter personas were still largely anti-Clinton and expressed pro-Bernie Sanders and pro-Jill Stein sentiments.”

            Likewise, the report said “pro-Bernie Sanders and Jill Stein content” were among the group’s go-to themes across other platforms.

            The tactics and strategies that the Kremlin directed included every major social media platform you can think of — Facebook, Instagram, Twitter — and a few you’d never suspect, including Pinterest, LinkedIn and 4Chan. The hashtags alone tell the story— #MAGA #TrumpTrain #Hillary4Prison #ZombieHillary #SickHillary. Along with anti-Clinton stories, they also pushed out messages against Trump’s primary rivals like Sen. Ted Cruz and former Gov. Jeb Bush. Once in the general election, they pumped up third-party candidates to siphon support away from Clinton with posts including, “A vote for Jill Stein is not a wasted vote.”

            Not everything I don’t like is Russian. But some Russian things, I don’t like.

          • bobburger@fedia.io
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            18
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            6 hours ago

            lol, what a stupid way to say “yes, Jill Stein and her active campaign to get Donald Trump elected does support my values”

            • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              23
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Third parties wouldn’t be a threat to their power if they weren’t shit parties.

              Why don’t liberals vote for Trump and push him left after the election, since that worked out so well with Biden.

  • zephorah@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    2016 Wisconsin election results

    Wisconsin 2016.

    I can’t post more than one image because Lemmy/Memmy makes the images fall apart into a 2 mile long scroll.

  • BigFig@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    I’m sorry but, Is that weird neck thing shes wearing…chain link fence patterned

    • anon6789@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      It is a fishnet pattern keffiyeh (Palestinian headdress), as she seems to be wearing it around a lot to appear as the most pro-Palestinian candidate.

      From NPR

      Some say patterns on the keffiyeh symbolize different aspects of Palestinian life: the bold black stripes on the edges symbolize the historical trade routes that used to go through Palestine; the fishnet-like design represents the Palestinians’ ties to the Mediterranean Sea; and the curvy lines resemble olive trees, a major point of pride for Palestinians.

      Though none of these claims can be backed up by historical evidence, over the past 10 years they’ve become embraced by Palestinians in the diaspora to be the meaning behind their keffiyeh’s patterns.

      • BigFig@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        keffiyeh

        just googled around a little and im not the only one that sees a chainlink fence…I suppose it fits the current state of gaza too.

  • StinkySocialist@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    40
    ·
    5 hours ago

    All the weird Jill Stein hate on here is what made me decide to vote for her lol. Just sent in my ballot last week. Don’t worry I’m not in a swing state. 🤣

  • SoJB@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    63
    ·
    7 hours ago

    That’s a weird way to say “Harris ticket fails to motivate voters to their side”

    To clarify, Stein is a literal compromised grifter.

    So is most of the RNC. I remember that 4th of July emergency flight to Moscow to hand deliver a letter to Putin.

    It’s not hard to beat these people. Unless you’re liberal I guess.