fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agoRabbit Populationmander.xyzimagemessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1445arrow-down113
arrow-up1432arrow-down1imageRabbit Populationmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 month agomessage-square20fedilink
minus-squareBinette@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up24·edit-21 month agoAnd the best part in this is that it all aligns with the Mandelbrot set, for some reason Edit: Nevermind, it’s the bifurcation diagram of the Mandelbrot set that does this.
minus-squarefossilesque@mander.xyzOPMlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up16·1 month agoLife is just fractals tbh
minus-squareshneancy@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·1 month agofunny how you can come to the same conclusions if you’re - a) doing science b) doing Buddhism c) doing drugs
minus-squarebsolos@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10·edit-21 month agoIt doesn’t, the one that aligns is the bifurcation diagram of the function used to make the set (f(z)=z^2+c), which is different from the rabbit one (the logistic map, f(x)=rx(1-x)).
minus-squareMatch!!linkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·1 month agothat’s meaningless because every bifurcation map looks the same
And the best part in this is that it all aligns with the Mandelbrot set, for some reason
Edit: Nevermind, it’s the bifurcation diagram of the Mandelbrot set that does this.
Life is just fractals tbh
funny how you can come to the same conclusions if you’re - a) doing science b) doing Buddhism c) doing drugs
It doesn’t, the one that aligns is the bifurcation diagram of the function used to make the set (f(z)=z^2+c), which is different from the rabbit one (the logistic map, f(x)=rx(1-x)).
Oh I never knew that!
that’s meaningless because every bifurcation map looks the same