• figjam@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    2 months ago

    I assume they are talking about the newer models that have worse sight lines than literal tanks.

    • 0x0@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      Well true, but have you looked at european SUVs lately? They’re getting there and i don’t see the EU doing anything to limit dimensions.

      • lenz@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        This comment is pure Whataboutism. You asked what was wrong with the F150’s and you got answered. And your response is, “well, the european ones are probably gonna do it too!”

        C’mon man.

        Regardless of who’s doing it, it still sucks and is bad.

        • 0x0@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          I know a lot of people thought i was defending the F150s - i wasn’t, just asking - and i never said i liked them.

          I don’t, i think new pick-up trucks are ridiculous and the artificial enlargement is equally ridiculous and dangerous. Yet they sell in the EU, don’t they?

          The enlargement trend isn’t exclusive to pick-up trucks and has long since been adopted by SUVs. The BMW X6 is sold in the EU.

          Even the fucking Hummer is sold in the EU! That should not be road legal.

          So the takeaway is that ruling bodies don’t really care about pedestrians, but that’s a known fact, so going after a particular model because it’s cool to do so is just dumbshit hive mentality, be it the cybertruck or another vehicle. Then again, someone else in the comments got downvoted as well for condemning vandalism so… typicial redditlemmy i guess.