• LunchMoneyThief@links.hackliberty.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I’ll assume that Loongson are equally as backdoored, but by Chinese intelligence rather than US intelligence.

    RISC-V and OpenPOWER are the last remaining non-user-hostile ISAs. That and possibly old x86.

  • recursive_recursion they/them@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    If Intel happens to potentially go under by losing China, the US government coming in would be convenient for both parties.

    So Intel’s in a funny position where they can actually pressure China for more economic incentives like subsidies or tax breaks

    • Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 minutes ago

      They spent 16 billion dollars in R&D in 2023, which is a bit lower than the 17 billion in 2022, but still way higher than the 13 billion from 2019. In 2023 they distributed as dividends (might be wrong on the calculation here, but I think that this is the right number, 1 billion dollars)

    • demesisx@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Look it up. The latest generation of Intel chips have incredibly egregious issues.

      If you think you’re owning the Chinese by supporting Intel, you’re very misguided. Instead, you should be hoping for RISC-V to catch on because closed architectures are vastly more vulnerable to exploitation. They represent an unknown tech stack which is a no-no for anyone who actually values freedom, privacy, and liberty. They also cost tens of millions to create while RISC-V costs significantly less since it doesn’t require a company to buy a million dollar license to build on a closed architecture.

      • bamboo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The architecture being open source or not has nothing to do with security. All high performance risc-v cpu designs are proprietary. The instruction set itself is open source, but beyond that you have as much visibility into the internals of the processor as you would with an Intel one. The only thing the license impacts is that you can legally make your own risc-v processor if you want, whereas tou can’t make your own x86 processor if you want (legally).

      • Keeponstalin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Plus Intel supports Apartheid Israel. Both the company and their tech don’t support freedom, privacy, or liberty

        • Soluna@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Legitimately back when I chose my CPU and I was debating between the Intel i9 14900K and the AMD 7950x3D, my final decision to go with AMD came down to this because at the time their specs seemed almost identical. And based on the more recent news about the 14 series, I absolutely made the right decision! 🇵🇸

      • just_another_person@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        No, I get that. The statement from them makes it seem like retaliation for Huawei being banned in the US though. They have their own shitty x86 chips they apparently don’t seem psyched to use instead as well.