“We see it now: The hate has shifted to the trans community,” Walz said. “They see that as an opportunity. If you’re watching any sporting events right now, you see that Donald Trump’s closing arguments are to demonize a group of people for being who they are.”

“We’re out there trying to make the case that access to healthcare, a clean environment, manufacturing jobs, and keeping your local hospital open are what people are really concerned about,” he continued. “They’re running millions of dollars of ads demonizing folks who are just trying to live their lives.”

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    The cynic in me is telling me that taking time to speak about such a small demographic, all of whom already have a clear reason to side with him, won’t gain a single extra vote.

        • Flying Squid@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          This you?

          The cynic in me is telling me that taking time to speak about such a small demographic, all of whom already have a clear reason to side with him, won’t gain a single extra vote.

          Then yes I was. It isn’t just about that demographic.

          • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            9
            ·
            2 months ago

            Me, a Democrat supporter, in this discussion on Lemmy of all places

            You think I need to be reminded that protecting minority demographics including trans is a popular stance? You think I didn’t know that information? You think that information detracts from the point that it’s not a stance capable of attracting swing voters this late in the election cycle?

            You’ve clearly built an opponent in your mind and its all you can see when you look at me. I shut his ass down immediately rather than engage in that conversation.

    • assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      No, but:

      1. It will build enthusiasm and make it more likely for people to actually go out and vote.

      2. It’s the fucking right thing to do, and I’m glad to see a politician stand for it.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        And notably the first one does “gain extra votes”. And those voters who like rather than just accept their most closely aligned candidates will talk to other people in their orbit to get them out to vote. The votes to gain aren’t just a few clueless people in the center.

    • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      ·
      2 months ago

      The point isn’t to get the trans vote. Like you say it’s kinda a no brainer for trans people to vote for anyone running against a transphobic guy.

      The point is to put out a rational response to what Trump is doing. Explain to people that might be worried about trans people that it’s just a tactic meant to distract people from the real issues.

      So get people to be less scared of trans people so they’ll focus on actual issues and vote Dem.

    • orcrist@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 months ago

      Of course it will get votes. Reminding people of basic human decency is a time honored campaign tactic, especially when the opponent is being a giant jerkface.

      • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        If people are only just now seeing which party aligns with basic human decency then my expectations are low.