• The Snark Urge@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    168
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 days ago

    Totally uncomfortable with the existence of their own dick, plus dating a girl. Quick maths, anon is a lesbian.

      • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        32
        ·
        22 days ago

        Bad take.

        You’re erasing the existence of Sappho, who was so gay for girls that the island she came from—the place heretofore unknown for anything—is now known for just how goddamn queer she was, and everyone who experiences sapphic love (hey, another word that got coined off of one poet’s fantastically omnipresent woman lust).

        Lesbians. Sapphic lesbians. From Lesbos. That Sappho started. Why?

        Girls pretty.

          • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            26
            ·
            22 days ago

            Let’s make things clear: you don’t need a euphemism.

            I want more euphemisms. I want this language to have some goddamn options and I want the number of words in this language to never fucking decrease for any reason.

              • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                20
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                22 days ago

                Every single one of those words should exist. Even the slurs. That way, we know who’s trouble.

                Motherfucker, I do not believe I made myself clear, so allow me to retort:

                Languages should not ever shrink at all. Ever. Shrinking languages is some nazi-ass, 1984-ass fascist shit.

                  • Tanis Nikana@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    16
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    22 days ago

                    It is not.

                    To censor a language is to censor thought itself.

                    And if slurs and insults become censored and incapable of thought, what else is on the table, up for removal? Words about being queer, words about body rights, words about lived experiences, words that aren’t fucking corpo-washed.

                    I have made my point in an unerring straight goddamn line.

                    Languages should not shrink for any goddamn reason.

                    Now go to bed, it’s 5:37 in the morning.

      • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        22 days ago

        We should just get rid of the word and say gay woman instead

        Or how ‘bout this radical idea - we should let lesbians decide what word to call themselves? It’s awfully odd to decide to redefine a group of people without getting that group’s input on the matter.

          • Whats_your_reasoning@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            22 days ago

            Thank you for including these perspectives. This is the kind of context that puts the big picture together.

            I apologize for coming off rude. It’s not easy to tell online which perspective a person is arguing from, or if they are arguing in good faith. I appreciate that you provided additional information and viewpoints from other people. It gives me something new to think about.