• average650@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    My judgement isn’t above question. I don’t know why you think that I think it is.

    You’re saying her perspective of an event that she was present for is incorrect and your perspective of an event that you weren’t there for is more correct.

    I never said that. I don’t believe that.

    I think that, given the context provided, he was excited about a topic he was passionate about, nothing more. If there’s more context, I may well be wrong. But we don’t have that and in the absence of more information, my opinion is my opinion.

    I have offered an alternative that believe is more compelling. I might be wrong, but given the information provided, I think my reasons are good.

    She had more context, and she might be right. But that hasn’t been provided to us, so I can’t respond to any of that.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Ugh. Dude. Are you literally programmed to ignore women as a source of information? You have more context. She implied he’d be upset if she told him that was her plan. Why do you disbelieve that? You’re literally creating extra information that isn’t there to question her narrative that she’s given you zero reason to not believe. Why is your default to simply not believe her?

      And buddy, if your judgement isn’t above questioning, you’re trying really hard to argue that it’s more legitimate than hers.

      Edit: so to summarize your point. Given a bunch of made up information, you disbelieve her, for no reason, other than the hypothetical you made up in your head. Got it. Totally normal way to respond to this. Not at all toxic or unhealthy in any way. You’re totally a positive influence on society.

      • Lhianna@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ehhh, her last sentence kinda sounds like she didn’t want to make him sad by telling him she already knew all of this because he was so happy about sharing.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Honestly, I like that interpretation much much more. Just makes me realize how much seeing others take it so negatively even made me see it more negatively.

      • average650@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        None of that accurately describes my position. Please reread my posts. I have doubts you are giving a good faith effort.

        • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I’m starting to doubt that you have actual capacity for comprehensive reasoning. That is absolutely a direct inference of your position. Just saying “no it’s not” doesn’t just make it so. All of that is true if one holds your position.