• KoboldCoterie
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Given that, I expect you’ll be voting for the ‘less bad’ candidate, rather than wasting your vote on a protest candidate which only assists the ‘more bad’ candidate in winning, then?

    • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      No, I will not be voting. If I were to be able to vote, I would prefer a candidate who works to stop innocent people from being killed, rather than condone it happening. I find that quite an important moral issue.

        • Samvega@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 hours ago

          You can’t go from an “if” to a “you” accusatory statement so well when that “if” isn’t true.

          • KoboldCoterie
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            If the ‘If’ isn’t true, then the ‘you’ doesn’t apply to you, that’s how conditionals work.